• Lembot_0001@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Maybe some tariffs then? You know, to balance the US-EU weapons trade? How much EU weaponry does the US buy? :)

    • Saleh@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Since war weapons are bought by the government with public money, putting tariffs on them doesn’t do anything. You can only make an effect with tariffs on purchases by private entities. In that sense the EU could put tariffs on weapon parts that European manufacturers buy from the US. I am not sure how big that market is though. AFAIK a lot of EU components end up in US weapons, for instance optics for military vehicles.

      • Lembot_0001@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        15 hours ago

        putting tariffs on them doesn’t do anything.

        It does! I’m not a lawyer and know nothing about EU law in this regard but in my country, tariffs would effectively raise the US weaponry prices making them impossible to win a tender (not sure if that is correct English terminology) unless they offer something that EU just don’t produce at all or the price is ridiculously high.

        • Saleh@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          15 hours ago

          You could more easily exclude US products from tenders for security/strategic reasons. That is easier to achieve and more honest.

    • Tar_Alcaran@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      17 hours ago

      Hey, the US can still bid on EU arms programs, but we’ll have to put a 200% tarriff in to balance the trade, because that’s totally how it works.

      Wait, let me check with chatGPT to confirm.

      Yep, that’s how it works!