I don’t want to have to log into my alarm clock anymore.

“Ditch Windows” is a fair answer. I’m working on it.

  • jagged_circle@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    I recommended a watch

    Not a smart watch. A regular digital. They work great. Highly reliable. No login necessary.

      • jagged_circle@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        19 hours ago

        Why not? The battery lasts about 2 years, and the LCD numbers slowly (and very noticeably) get darker over a period of weeks before it dies, so you have plenty of notice.

        • desktop_user@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          13 hours ago

          unless it lasts more than 100 years it could reasonably fail within someone’s life. Nuclear energy is nice because it is more or less the only energy source that can do this.

            • desktop_user@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              11 hours ago

              exactly the worst time for it too fail. if it failed only when you treated it perfectly there would be almost no issue as you could just replace it. A good system should only ever rely on basic competence for things that instincts will remind the human to do (food and water) and not break down when the person is in a depression spiral.

      • madjo@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        There are watches that don’t require a battery. Some require you to rewind by hand, by turning the crown, others are powered by wrist movements.