I don’t want to have to log into my alarm clock anymore.

“Ditch Windows” is a fair answer. I’m working on it.

    • jagged_circle@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      19 hours ago

      Why not? The battery lasts about 2 years, and the LCD numbers slowly (and very noticeably) get darker over a period of weeks before it dies, so you have plenty of notice.

      • desktop_user@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        13 hours ago

        unless it lasts more than 100 years it could reasonably fail within someone’s life. Nuclear energy is nice because it is more or less the only energy source that can do this.

          • desktop_user@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            11 hours ago

            exactly the worst time for it too fail. if it failed only when you treated it perfectly there would be almost no issue as you could just replace it. A good system should only ever rely on basic competence for things that instincts will remind the human to do (food and water) and not break down when the person is in a depression spiral.

    • madjo@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      There are watches that don’t require a battery. Some require you to rewind by hand, by turning the crown, others are powered by wrist movements.