Note that there still have been no studies on its efficacy. At worst, it is a great font to avoid ambiguity between characters.

  • Mattster_Of_Puppets@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Would I be able to add this to my Kobo e-reader?

    I wear glasses - but read in bed without them. I have a larger font size set - but thus looks like a clearer font too

  • LaLuzDelSol@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    5 hours ago

    I have good vision but I actually really like this font since i have a smaller phone screen! Anyone know how to install it on an Android phone?

  • JayGray91@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    9 hours ago

    At the top of the page, I can feel there’s something different. It really felt weird to read.

    But the more I read and scroll it somehow gets easier? Something like that.

    But most of all I appreciate that there’s differentiation for all the potentially confusing situations that can and has been used for scams.

    Time to try it more widely I suppose.

  • RutabagasnTurnips@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    19 hours ago

    I see a lot of people discussing this font and mentioning OpenDyslexia.

    I couldn’t find research on Atkinson Hyperlegible. It says it was recently this year, I also couldn’t find any research on effectuveness when I looked through the website. If I missed it I aplogize and would love to learn more if someone wants to take the time to link/copy the applicable info. My hope is since it’s a non-profit group focusing on helping those with vision problems it has been well developed tested for effectiveness. Certainly if someone wants to try for themselves please do. Before going all out though say converting large volumes of things or implementing for a classroom I think asking questions would be prudent.

    Unfortunately OpenDyslexia does not actually help those with this learn disability! The authors of the below article do a good job of discussing why and the harm misconception/misuse of products like these can create.

    Wery JJ, Diliberto JA. The effect of a specialized dyslexia font, OpenDyslexic, on reading rate and accuracy. Ann Dyslexia. 2017 Jul;67(2):114-127. doi: 10.1007/s11881-016-0127-1. Epub 2016 Mar 18. PMID: 26993270; PMCID: PMC5629233. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5629233/

    Here is some more info and strategies for those instered in regards to dyslexia. https://childmind.org/article/understanding-dyslexia/

    • xye@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      Damn, I was hoping the research would pan out here. I have problems reading longer chunks of text but OpenDyslexia has helped me with that. I read exclusively on my Kobo (which has it included as a font by default) because of it.

      • RutabagasnTurnips@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        39 minutes ago

        It would be great if it did show improvement when evaluated in research. The clinical evidence just isn’t there though.

        There is nothing stopping someone from enjoying it out of pure personal preference though.

    • snek_boi@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      15 hours ago

      Thank you so much for taking the time to research and share you findings.

      As to Atkinson Hyperlegible, I suppose its merit could be, at most, making it harder to confuse characters such as B8, O0, or 1Iil.

      Beyond these benefits (and as you mentioned), there is just not enough information on whether Atkinson Hyperlegible definitely helps or not.

      Also, thanks for the link on dyslexia. I suppose that, to an extent, promoting fonts like Open Dyslexia could lead to the unintended consequences described in the article.

    • lol_idk@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 hours ago

      I find this harder to read than almost any other “normal” font. I wonder if I have some other reading impairment I’ve never been aware of - having recently discovered I’m also not neurotypical

      • Don Antonio Magino@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        To be honest, studies around whether this font is actually easier to read for people with dyslexia haven’t shown that to be the case. At least, that’s what I remember from reading about it in a Dutch skeptic magazine (Skepter) some time ago. So if you have dyslexia and find this font harder to read, that doesn’t have to say anything about you.

        EDIT: this seems to be the article I read, though it’s from ten years ago.

    • go $fsck yourself@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      18 hours ago

      I find it ironic that their website has extremely low contrasting colors making it very hard to read.

      (Look at the top left for the worst example)

    • snek_boi@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      20 hours ago

      I actually changed my Anki to OpenDyslexic a couple of months ago! I changed it again when Atkinson Hyperlegible Next came out, but I agree that OpenDyslexic makes reading a breeze.

      My only grievance with OpenDyslexic is that I don’t think I could send reports with this font without pushback. On the other hand, I have sent multiple reports using Atkinson Hyperlegible and nobody has ever said a thing.

    • AnimalsDream@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      24 hours ago

      I wish there was an open font that tries to do the same thing, but with an aesthetic that wasn’t reminiscent of comic sans.

          • JustARaccoon@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 hours ago

            Well yes but beauty standards for typography run counter to accommodating for dyslexia, especially for sans serifs. Similarity in shapes, curves, weights, and stroke width are seen as beautiful, but they’re exactly what must be given up for more accessible typography.

            Someone else in the comments here did mention Bionic Reading though, and there’s a free alternative in Fast Font, which has a gradient of weights for each word from black for the first letter to thin for the last one. Might be something to consider

        • AnimalsDream@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          I like how that font disambiguates glyphs that often get confused, but I found it to be pretty hard to look at, honestly. I think the main issue might be that the line thickness appears to be uniform at all parts in all letters.

    • Flagstaff@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      19 hours ago

      I wonder how it works. Maybe it has to do with the intentional varying of the sizes of holes in letters, and the lopsided lines so one can’t be confused as another.

      • cynar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        14 hours ago

        While dyslexia is actually a cluster of related issues, a common one seems to be with dimensionality. Basically, the reader’s brain assumes the objects are 3 dimensional. When the eyes make micro adjustments, the letters don’t rotate, since they are 2D. The brain misinterprets this as them rotating, or moving. This is perceived as them flickering or moving, in the corner of your eye.

        There are several ways to break this effect. I suspect the shape is intended to mess with and slightly overload the depth sense. Strong colours can also disrupt it. E.g. via a coloured filter or glasses.

        Just to note, my knowledge/research on this was 20 years ago, so might be outdated now. The coloured filters (actually tinted reading glasses) did help a relative overcome dyslexia however.

  • untorquer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    I think this actually has a negative effect for me. It’s like every character is now screaming for my attention, and my brain can’t read whole words and phrases. I have to process the letters first. Though it’s possible this could be more to do with the website’s rendering on mobile and default font size.

    • snek_boi@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      20 hours ago

      That’s interesting. I’d love to know if you have the same experience on a desktop and with different font sizes.

      • Flagstaff@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        19 hours ago

        It’s fine for me on mobile, and I’m glad that the “I” has horizontal lines. So many scammers adopt fake usernames by using an “I” (capital “i”) instead of an “l” (lowercase “L”) and vice versa.

    • Great Blue Heron@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      It doesn’t work for me either. Just reading the text on the page linked here was uncomfortable. It’s not like you describe though - for me it’s like there’s too much white space and there’s this mass of words almost floating around the page and it’s hard to keep track of where I’m up to. I am a bad/slow reader and all reading is like that for me - that font just seems to make it worse.

      • CandleTiger@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        17 hours ago

        I think this font is meant for people with bad eyesight. The website doesn’t make any claims about trouble reading for other reasons.

        I’ve always read very fast with no problems but now I’m old and can’t see small print as easily. This font actually was much more comfortable for me to read without my glasses, which I guess is nice for me but no use at all for you.

        How do you feel about comic sans and the open dyslexia font some other comments on this page are talking about with positive and negative comments? Do those make any difference at all to you?

  • NONE@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    1 day ago

    I have been using this font as the default font on my personal laptop and I am more than happy with the way it looks and reads.

    • snek_boi@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 day ago

      A couple of years ago I tried using the original Atkinson Hyperlegible (the one published a couple of years ago, before “Next”) on GNOME and my settings didn’t quite work. I had scaling at around 100% and increased the font size a little bit because I was having a hard time reading the font (the irony!). You inspired me to try again, but now with Atkinson Hyperlegible Next!