• Snowstorm@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    4 days ago

    When can we expel the US ambassador until they stop with this 51st state nonsense? I don’t even see the point of discussing Nafta 3.0 if the clown can’t respect his own signature. We will take the temporary 30% cut to gdp and emerge stronger in a few years.

  • Troy@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    5 days ago

    The most ridiculous thing here is the assumption that Canadians would ever be more than Puerto Ricans in this scenario.

    (1) We’d only ever join under duress

    (2) If democracy still exists in the US, we wouldn’t be given the vote, because we’d vote against them

    (3) If democracy doesn’t exist anymore, then whether we are called a state or not is irrelevant

    (4) Canada gets turned into a strip mine with everyone conscripted to go fight against Mexico or whatever Roman Empire-style nonsense follows so that we can’t organize resistance

  • Arghblarg@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    6 days ago

    Gotta hand it to him, even though he pissed off most of us (and I will never forgive him for reneging on electoral reform and reigning in CSIS/CSE for domestic surveillance), he’s at least appearing to do the right things for our security during his swan song.

    • WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 days ago

      No. We don’t have a mechanism to add new provinces to Canada. The current provinces are defined by the Constitution and the only way to change our Constitution is to re-write the whole thing and get all ten existing provinces to agree to it (we don’t have a constitutional amendment process.) The best you could do is to be a new territory; those can be created through a simple majority in Parliament.

      • bubblewrap@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 days ago

        This is incorrect, adding new provinces is covered under the 7/50 amendment protocol: a motion must pass in the HoC, Senate, and 7/10 provincial legislatures and those provincial legislatures must represent 50% of the Canadian population.

      • BCsven@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        As somebody that doesn’t quite understand the difference between a province and a territory, can you explain?

        • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 days ago

          Provinces have powers outlined in the constitution. Territories don’t. Territories are to the Federal government similar to what municipalities are to the Provincial government. A Province can dissolve a municipal government, merge them, create new ones, and the Federal government can do the same kinds of things with Territories.

        • Revan343@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          Provinces have more autonomy and more representation in the Federal government, is the gist of it.

  • AnarchoDakosaurus@toast.ooo
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    Mr Trudeau just tell us when we need to De Nazify the Whitehouse we are ready for the special military operation. 3 days to D.C. Quick in and out.

    • brax@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      5 days ago

      President Musk going hard after the countries with metal deposits that will help the electric vehicle company he bought, raised, and then shit all over.