• froztbyte@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    1 day ago

    the build artifact is distributed MIT-licensed, that’s substantially different (and intentionally subversive). there is no reproducibility. which, you know, hint hint nudge nudge that thing that I already said

    I realize that outsourced thinking is why you want LLMs, but it clearly still doesn’t help. maybe you should try the old brainmeat. just stop huffing your farts first, those are bad for you

    • leisesprecher@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      1 day ago

      So in that thinking, Wikipedia is not open source, if the editor used a proprietary browser?

      Maybe you should try not to act like a complete asshole. You’re pedantic in all the wrong places and extremely arrogant. I know, living in your lonely world makes a bitter person, but you’re still wrong and you’re still an asshole.

        • self@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          1 day ago

          also:

          So in that thinking, Wikipedia is not open source, if the editor used a proprietary browser?

          fucking no! how in fuck do you manage to misunderstand LLMs so much that you think the weights not being reproducible is at all comparable to… editing Wikipedia from a proprietary browser??? this shit isn’t even remotely exotic from an open source standpoint — it’s a binary blob loaded by an open source framework, like how binary blob modules taint the Linux kernel (you glided right past this reference when our other poster made it, weird that) or how loading a proprietary ROM in an open source emulator doesn’t make the ROM open source. the weights being permissively licensed doesn’t make them open source (or really make any sense at all) if the source literally isn’t available.