• leisesprecher@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    1 day ago

    So in that thinking, Wikipedia is not open source, if the editor used a proprietary browser?

    Maybe you should try not to act like a complete asshole. You’re pedantic in all the wrong places and extremely arrogant. I know, living in your lonely world makes a bitter person, but you’re still wrong and you’re still an asshole.

      • self@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        1 day ago

        also:

        So in that thinking, Wikipedia is not open source, if the editor used a proprietary browser?

        fucking no! how in fuck do you manage to misunderstand LLMs so much that you think the weights not being reproducible is at all comparable to… editing Wikipedia from a proprietary browser??? this shit isn’t even remotely exotic from an open source standpoint — it’s a binary blob loaded by an open source framework, like how binary blob modules taint the Linux kernel (you glided right past this reference when our other poster made it, weird that) or how loading a proprietary ROM in an open source emulator doesn’t make the ROM open source. the weights being permissively licensed doesn’t make them open source (or really make any sense at all) if the source literally isn’t available.