fossilesque@mander.xyz to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 24 hours agoWhy Mark Zuckerberg wants to redefine open source so badlywww.zdnet.comexternal-linkmessage-square74fedilinkarrow-up1447arrow-down111cross-posted to: technology@lemmit.online
arrow-up1436arrow-down1external-linkWhy Mark Zuckerberg wants to redefine open source so badlywww.zdnet.comfossilesque@mander.xyz to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 24 hours agomessage-square74fedilinkcross-posted to: technology@lemmit.online
minus-squareairglow@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·edit-26 hours agoThat’s incorrect. GPL licenses are open source. The GPL does not restrict anyone from selling or distributing GPL-licensed software as a component of an aggregate software distribution. For example, all Linux distributions contain GPL-licensed software, as the Linux kernel is GPLv2.
That’s incorrect. GPL licenses are open source.
The GPL does not restrict anyone from selling or distributing GPL-licensed software as a component of an aggregate software distribution. For example, all Linux distributions contain GPL-licensed software, as the Linux kernel is GPLv2.