fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 2 months agomoms rulemander.xyzimagemessage-square88fedilinkarrow-up1976arrow-down114
arrow-up1962arrow-down1imagemoms rulemander.xyzfossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square88fedilink
minus-squareIllecors@lemmy.cafelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 months agoThis assumes a single child per set of parents, doesn’t it?
minus-squareSkunkWorkz@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·edit-22 months agoNo I’m talking about the amount of ancestors in the 80th generation back not the total amount of ancestors. It doesn’t matter how many children each set of parents had for that number.
This assumes a single child per set of parents, doesn’t it?
No I’m talking about the amount of ancestors in the 80th generation back not the total amount of ancestors. It doesn’t matter how many children each set of parents had for that number.