Striker@lemmy.worldM to Mildly Infuriating@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-22 years agoAmazon Anti Union propagandalemmy.worldimagemessage-square163fedilinkarrow-up11.8Karrow-down131cross-posted to: antiwork@lemmy.world
arrow-up11.77Karrow-down1imageAmazon Anti Union propagandalemmy.worldStriker@lemmy.worldM to Mildly Infuriating@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-22 years agomessage-square163fedilinkcross-posted to: antiwork@lemmy.world
minus-squareNot_Alec_Baldwin@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up30arrow-down1·2 years agoThat’s because the manager is incentivized to not help you, while the union is incentivized to help you. Unions are game-theoretically necessary.
minus-squareNatanael@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·2 years agoIf employers have organizations advocating for them, it only makes sense for employees to have the same
That’s because the manager is incentivized to not help you, while the union is incentivized to help you.
Unions are game-theoretically necessary.
If employers have organizations advocating for them, it only makes sense for employees to have the same