plumbercraic@lemmy.sdf.orgM to theyknew@lemmy.sdf.orgEnglish · 6 days agoSoothe away tensionslemmy.sdf.orgimagemessage-square74fedilinkarrow-up1448arrow-down18
arrow-up1440arrow-down1imageSoothe away tensionslemmy.sdf.orgplumbercraic@lemmy.sdf.orgM to theyknew@lemmy.sdf.orgEnglish · 6 days agomessage-square74fedilink
minus-squareByteMe@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up19·6 days agoAll I see is that it costs 4,99
minus-squareSanctimoniousApe@lemmings.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up19·edit-26 days agoI think that hairstyle was popular in the mid-1960s - if I’m right, that’s roughly $50 in today’s money. Edit: source is https://www.usinflationcalculator.com/ using the year 1965, and the official US government inflation calculator seems to concur.
minus-squaremosiacmango@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11·6 days agoIm guessing the year is 1970. That $5 is equivalent to $31 now. Bought right for a cheap, but otherwise quality vibrator.
minus-squarefrezik@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·6 days agoThere are Aliexpress vibrators roughly that price right now. They probably break right away, and the plastic is questionable to insert into the human body, but they exist.
minus-squareChocrates@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·6 days agoPlastic from that era probably has the same descriptors.
All I see is that it costs 4,99
I think that hairstyle was popular in the mid-1960s - if I’m right, that’s roughly $50 in today’s money.
Edit: source is https://www.usinflationcalculator.com/ using the year 1965, and the official US government inflation calculator seems to concur.
Im guessing the year is 1970. That $5 is equivalent to $31 now.
Bought right for a cheap, but otherwise quality vibrator.
There are Aliexpress vibrators roughly that price right now. They probably break right away, and the plastic is questionable to insert into the human body, but they exist.
Plastic from that era probably has the same descriptors.