nytimes.com
www.nytimes.com

Archived version, for posterity.

Take note Bluesky fans: Your “benevolent” controlling nonprofit can quickly become a for-profit if enough cash is thrown at the governing board…

  • discimus@mander.xyzEnglish
    22·
    18 hours ago

    Reaching A.G.I. could also reshape OpenAI’s business. When that declaration is made, Microsoft loses its rights to use OpenAI’s technology, according to the investment contract it signed with OpenAI. If OpenAI severs its ties to Microsoft, it could consider partnerships with other tech giants.

    Already, OpenAI’s for-profit company has used this potential declaration as leverage against Microsoft — warning that if Microsoft will not agree to better terms, the nonprofit might issue this declaration and void their entire agreement, according to a person familiar with the company’s negotiations.

    That’s pretty messed up. So whenever OpenAI says they’ve achieved AGI it’s just a gonna be a lie.

    • JasminIstMuede@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish
      7·
      17 hours ago

      I’m actually surprised AGI isn’t better defined in the contract, or that there isn’t a burden of proof so that they can’t lie, but that was definitely on purpose. I really can’t imagine them severing that tie though; OpenAI simply isn’t financially stable enough, especially in the long term, and I’m sure they know it too.

      • hamsterkill@lemmy.sdf.orgEnglish
        2·
        7 hours ago

        I’m actually surprised AGI isn’t better defined in the contract

        There’ll be a significant lawsuit if OpenAI tries such a declaration without MS on board with it.

        But i’m not sure how much OpenAI is even investing toward AGI. LLM is their bread and butter and I don’t know many experts that think LLM is the path to AGI.