• forrcaho@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 hour ago

    I can’t get inside the head of any of the crazies who go on a rampage and shoot up a school or a house of worship, but it gives me comfort to think that such people now know that if they shoot a CEO instead of a classroom full of children they will be regarded as having made a positive contribution to society. I really hope school shootings will go down after this, and I think they may well.

  • werefreeatlast@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Its the same reality as before except they realize how close they are to the edge separating the game where they abuse us from the part where they don’t get to play the game.

    All of us play the game daily…go to work, do some good stuff, come home, eat, sleep. The good stuff. Why do we get so little and they get so much?

    • OttoHasslein@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      There’s a storm coming, Mr. Wayne. You and your friends better batten down the hatches, because when it hits, you’re all gonna wonder how you ever thought you could live so large and leave so little for the rest of us.

      Selina Kyle

  • s_s@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    6 hours ago

    I’d like to see one of these publications post recipes for CEO stew.

  • Gammelfisch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    10 hours ago

    US income distribution is on the same level as fucking Russia. Bring back the tax brackets from the 1950’s and 60’s.

  • varyingExpertise@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Most people don’t hate CEOs. They don’t care about CEOs. They have bigger issues to care about.

    “…and that’s a good thing, so we’ll see to it that it remains that way. Divide and conquer.”

    • BigDanishGuy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      10 hours ago

      That’s almost the exact qoute in my clipboard, and pretty much my response.

      Let’s not turn a tragic incident into a trend. Most people don’t hate CEOs. They don’t care about CEOs. They have bigger issues to care about.

      They will have bigger issues to care about. the quiet part said out loud.

      How can you be so oblivious? When you’re the biggest issue people have, then you get to act all indignant when people deals with their issues.

      • winterayars@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        9 hours ago

        They aren’t oblivious, they’re just relying on the operation of our society and their personal and organizational power to protect them. They don’t give a fuck, and they don’t want to give a fuck.

  • redisdead@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    13 hours ago

    “When I was growing up, CEOs didn’t make millions more than everyone else in the company. I think we have to reflect on why there’s so much anger and do something about it.”, said someone who will do absolutely nothing about it.

  • Chee_Koala@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    edit-2
    15 hours ago

    "…

    We are quoting anonymously those who did respond, to allow them the freedom to give us their most candid answers. These have been edited for length and clarity. Some have previously been reported by Fortune.

    **Personal responses to the killing **

    — “The disconnect between public perception and personal humanity has been striking, with some commentary bordering on dehumanizing. This highlights the critical need to humanize leadership and address the pressures faced in high-visibility roles.”

    — “My challenge is keeping employees engaged. How do you maintain a sense of purpose if you think your customers hate you?”

    — “I have to wonder if the demonization of corporate America and the wealthy over the last four years planted a mind virus in the assassin’s mind.”

    — “If you walk by the place where it happened, it’s business as usual, which gives me some perspective. This was a random killing by a mentally ill person. Let’s not turn a tragic incident into a trend. Most people don’t hate CEOs. They don’t care about CEOs. They have bigger issues to care about.”

    …"

    Wow. ‘demonization’, ‘need to humanize leadership’… Are these human people that were interviewed? Did these human persons speak anyone outside their immediate circle in the last three decades? I can hardly believe that, this is so out of touch that these folk may have never been touched by anything in their lives. I wasn’t prepared for this speedrun worldrecord to definitively prove total lack of empathy and understanding.

    • raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Most people don’t hate CEOs. They don’t care about CEOs. They have bigger issues to care about [that the CEOs created for them to distract them].

      In this current discussion, people are trying to open each others eyes about that silent part.

      Also: Most people don’t hate CEOs. But we do think CEOs have no right to be making more than a thousand times what an honest working person should make, actually sacrificing lives for their profit. And when that kind of stealing and mass murder is sanctioned by the law, then what are the options?

  • iAvicenna@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    edit-2
    14 hours ago

    “I have to wonder if the demonization of corporate America and the wealthy over the last four years planted a mind virus in the assassin’s mind.”

    Plot twist: the virus was actually the billionaires

  • naught101@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Bill George, a former Medtronic CEO and executive fellow at Harvard Business School. “People are in disbelief that they would be making this kid into a hero,” he told Fortune.

    Which “people”? Who are “they” in this context?

    Actually most of those quotes read as completely disconnected from normal people’s reality…

    • DrFistington@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Assholes who do the least amount of work and take 95% of the profit can’t figure out why the people who actually make the company money see them as parasites.

      Maybe have your Private jet fly you up a few thousand feet higher for a better view and you might be able to figure it out. Fucking assholes.

      It won’t be enough to eliminate the CEO’s. You’ve got to get the whole c suite and their kids. That should give them the perspective they need.

  • GrammarPolice@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    16 hours ago

    If you walk by the place where it happened, it’s business as usual, which gives me some perspective. This was a random killing by a mentally ill person. Let’s not turn a tragic incident into a trend. Most people don’t hate CEOs. They don’t care about CEOs. They have bigger issues to care about

    I hope this guy gets it next. How fucking out of touch can you be that you dismiss this as “a mentally ill person doing mentally ill things”? What a fucking loser!

    • thax@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      12 hours ago

      It’s insulting toward, what I believe to be, a plurality of the population. Luigi was a gift of a wake-up call. They’d do well to listen. Though, only government could really remedy the situation, and that’s not likely to happen. So we lurch forward toward instability. The powers at be seem more intent on transfixing the masses with fictions, distractions, and eventually: war.

    • HereIAm@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      14 hours ago

      I love the last line. They do indeed, like how to pay for chemotherapy treatment after their claim got denied.

  • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    18 hours ago

    This was at the end of the article Forbes presented me with:

    Do you have what it takes to make it to the C-suite? Learn how Fortune 500 CEOs overcame surprising obstacles on the road to the corner office…

    I don’t want to make it to the C-suite. That sounds awful. I want to help specific people solve problems they have helping other people.

    Do other people think like this? Like they want a corner office and a big car? Am I that fucking abnormal that this sounds like a death sentence to me?

    • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Every time I get a promotion I’ve had more and more distance between me and doing the actual work I get paid a lot more but I hate it. I have very little job satisfaction because the time scale of the things I’m working on has gone from days to months. Most of the time I just feel like I’m getting nothing done and it’s incredibly frustrating.

    • Demdaru@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Lemmy tends to have skewed perception of such things. Truth is, most people want money. As much as possible in as short time as possible. There’s a multitude of reasons, from wanting a luxurious life, to simply wanting to not have to worry about the money or to retire early, but pretty much everyone wants money. Look at how many folk join the lottery.

      Hell, most of Lemmy wants student debt to be forgotten. That’s gaining money, just in reverse order. Same with distributed wealth etc.

      World spins around money, no matter how you look at it.

      But sure as hell I wouldn’t like to be in a place I hate to earn it. :/

      • Hanrahan@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Truth is, most people want money. As much as possible in a

        It’s not unreasonable to aspire to not having money worries, the stess of it is literally a medical issue eg not having to worry about meeting mortgae or rent payments, a mechanical breakdown on a car, or paying for a dental emergency, a broken limb, or buying a new pair of shoes, replacing your laptop etc.

        Much past that is based on envy and that’s where it becomes toxic with wealth inequality. It’s human nature to feel envy, you can fight it but its inate in all humans, the ONLY solution is to recognise that and to remove it by removal of inequality. The inevitable end result of not doing that is the guillotine, social instability, or in this case a bullet.

        However… :) theres a whole other issue of the people in the first paragraph, who see themselves as the “everyday volk”, being incredibly unequal to the other 90% of the world. So there’s an irony there that they need to use force to preserve thier own status quo, much like the C-suite rely on force to protect their status quo (police, army etc) . You see this play out in anti immigrant and refugee hostility, build a wall etc

      • iAvicenna@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        13 hours ago

        Of those people who want more money to afford a comfortable life, it is much more rare to be mentally ill enough to want to be a billionaire and that is what is being discussed here really.

        And on the topic of wanting more money to afford a comfortable life, that mostly exists also because achieving this comfortable and fear free life is made more harder by these billionaires who view services which should be basic social rights as sectors that they can squeeze money out of.

        • Demdaru@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 hours ago

          Wanting to be billionaire is not to be mentally ill. Who doesn’t like power without responsibility? Whatever moral framework you’ve got, most folk wouldn’t subscribe to when given option to be billionaire. Sorry, but that’s reality - power makes people drunk, and it’s only natural for us to want power - power to make our families and friends live better, to make people we despise grovel, to have all we want. It takes discipline and ideals to veer off into helping everyone.

          And I agree with the lofe being made harder being the reason, but it doesn’t really apply to original comment I replied to.

          • rami@ani.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            8 hours ago

            sociopaths and children is who. have you ever been in charge of something important? something that actually matters to a number of people? if it turns into a power trip you need to grow the fuck up. it should be a humbling experience, that many people are relying on you take care of them in one way or another.

            and to make people you don’t like ‘grovel’ is just maintaining a cycle of violence.

    • Kekzkrieger@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      16 hours ago

      “suprising obstacles” lol as soon as it gets hard these fuckers just fuck off to a new ceo position at a different company.

      And the only thing hard about being ceo is making decisions that suck for your own employees like cutting back homeoffice or fire/rehire and not have a bad conscience. But since these fuckers dont have any moral or loyalality anyways it isnt hard for them at all.

    • mrmanager@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      17 hours ago

      People who read Forbes do.

      I think large parts of humanity still desires enormous amount of money and are willing to spend their lives focusing on it.

      It’s because money gives what people actually want - safety, respect, admiration, power, freedom etc.

    • Alex@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      17 hours ago

      They’re calvinists believing: the greater the wealth, the greater the morality. Taking it to its extremes is the point as is the cruel structural violence.

  • orcrist@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    17 hours ago

    “Well, corporate America is made up of hardworking Americans who do their best to reward the investors, and many times those investors are pension funds.”

    Ah hahaha. The CEO who got $h!tpwn3d was investigated for insider trading. He fucked the shareholders right in the nose.

    But even if he hadn’t, the investors are mostly the super rich. Giving them more money is in no way respectable or decent, knowing that the money is coming from the rest of us.

    But even if shareholder supremacy were admirable, we still don’t have it. CEOs who receive company stocks routinely inflate the value so they can sell them. It’s 100% legal, and I didn’t see any of the anonymous folk speaking out against the practice.

  • Mobiuthuselah@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    17 hours ago

    I’m happy to interpret. I’ve lived in-between long enough to know, you really can be that dumb a shit. Some folks really don’t have a clue. Bless their stupid hearts. Or damn them to hell, much nicer than the rest of us meant.