• Scubus@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      46
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      13 hours ago

      “The pd reportedly found 39 lbs of drugs at the premises, which took several trips to transport as the 35 lbs were found to be very volitile. So volitile, in fact, that by the time it had reached the locker, the 20lbs had decayed into 5lbs through natural breakdown. The department is looking to press charges for the 1lb they found, but it is unlikely that the defendants will see any prison time as a gram is not normally considered a serious crime.”

  • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    148
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    16 hours ago

    Don’t end it Anon, you just struck it rich my dude. The police tear apart your parents home looking for a nonexistent meth lab run by a nonexistent student and a photo as evidence which is a top search result?

    The police union basically just handed your family 10 Million Dollars after a brief lawsuit against the city.

      • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        10M was a stretch for sure, but a family in Jolliet recently got 2.9M USD for the police raiding the wrong house and quite a while back Dr. Lawrence Crosby got 1.25M USD for the police arresting him for the theft of his own car based on an anonymous tip, which is about as much “probable cause” as this case.

    • bassomitron@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      112
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      16 hours ago

      Man, that might happen for a high profile family/person. For average people in many places in the US, they’ll be lucky if the police even pay out to cover damages to property, nevermind anything else.

      Edit: and yes, I know this is just a green text and not a real story.

      • yetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        9 hours ago

        And anywhere outside the US, home searches are nearly always legal since they must be signed by a judge. And judges rarely rule against their own.

        Over here in Germany, where the inviolability of the home is in the constitution, the suspicion of any crime suffices for getting your home searched. This includes filesharing, spraying graffiti or insulting someone on the internet by calling them a dick. Plus, any resulting damages are only paid if you are found not guilty.

          • yetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            edit-2
            8 hours ago

            https://archive.is/RsyNC [unpaywalled Washington Post link]

            Some reactions:

            The text above reads: “Special Police Unit Wall and Color”

            The text below: “Andy, you are such 1 dick.”

            Later the police arrived:

            But again:

            And the cops came back:

            But finally:

            By the way, the case was finally dropped. Only because the outrage made them not pursue it though. Courts would have likely ruled this was an insult.

            • bassomitron@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              edit-2
              7 hours ago

              That’s wild that insults are a crime there, I never knew that. Quite funny back and forth, though. I laughed at how the writing got more and more chaotic haha

              As for your other comment, the US also requires a judge to sign off on a warrant for raiding/searching someone’s home. Some judges are more strict about it than others, and the more high profile you are, the more the judges tend to be stricter with approving them.

              However, if you’re in a poorer area and you’re not rich, it’s not unheard of for home raids to occur quite liberally. Hell, one of my old coworkers got raided a few years ago due to the police going to the wrong address (the intended house was across the street). And no, the police didn’t give shit for compensation and his family couldn’t afford to take it to court. He also just didn’t want to deal with potential repercussions of the police harassing him afterwards since he’s an immigrant (here legally, but yeah, lots of people here don’t care about that…).

        • empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          42
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          14 hours ago

          Very easy to tell whether they will get killed during the raid, simply follow the Standard Police Academy Appropriate Force chart:

      • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        25
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        16 hours ago

        There are tons of examples counter to your claim.

        A lot of the settlements probably don’t even get reported on at the request of the city in question.

        • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Yeah, 10 million might be a stretch. But the city I used to work in would immediately settle for 250k for something like that. Lawyers are expensive, and losing is more expensive

          • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 hours ago

            10M was a stretch for sure, but a family in Jolliet recently got 2.9M USD for the police raiding the wrong house and quite a while back Dr. Lawrence Crosby got 1.25M USD for the police arresting him for the theft of his own car based on an anonymous tip.

            • Szyler@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              5 hours ago

              Those are accidents vs the op which was not an accident. It was legit the right place and searching for the right thing. They had some evidence to do the search legally. So your comment and this hypothetical aren’t quite the same.

              • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                4 hours ago

                The judge and jury don’t know about the accident. The judge and jury will see that police raided an older couple’s house based on at most a stock photo, an anonymous tinder account, a photo of school laboratory from an unknown source (anon’s not even a real chemist), and an IP address which can be spoofed.

                In fact, they don’t even know anon is involved at all.

        • Crashumbc@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          13 hours ago

          While true, your hypothesis doesn’t take into consideration how often the police fuck up.

  • empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    92
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    17 hours ago

    “Hmm yes let me talk about a very illegal schedule I on an app that has access to my exact device location 24/7”

    Most intelligent greentexter

        • Mubelotix
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Anyone could have created the account for the joke. Police shouldn’t take social media accounts seriously

      • dohpaz42@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        33
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Pretty sure it doesn’t have to be illegal for the cops to turn your life inside out.

        • webghost0101@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          17
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          16 hours ago

          Absolutely, but i would call that the problematic behavior rather than the student committing a edgy joke.

            • webghost0101@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              edit-2
              13 hours ago

              A wellfare check by a social worker maybe. Can be at school if they fear the home to be dangerous.

              Combined with some extra patrol in the street because they HAVE to take things seriously.

              The potential damage such a raid can do (shoot your pet, ptsd) cannot be worth such reckless behavior.

              On a side note, i actually expect this post is fake.

      • Hanrahan@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        14 hours ago

        And the signs at aiports saying joking about bombs is illegal ? I can ignore them and crack on with my comedy bomb routine ?

        • webghost0101@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          edit-2
          13 hours ago

          In that context the specific act of joking is a crime because it can cause huge panic to happen.

          I would expand by saying that a joke about a realistic and immediate threat is not a joke at all and requires serious response to guarantee the safety of others.

          A student advertising ok social media that they are looking for volunteers in a meth schoolproject is not a direct threat to others. Neither is it a believable scenario.

          • shneancy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            11 hours ago

            yup, you can never “boy who cried wolf” yourself about possible and realistic emergency situations. Sure it sounds like a joke - but it either:

            is, nobody does anything, and nothing happens

            is, gets taken seriously, and some time and resources are wasted

            or

            isn’t, gets taken seriously, and a disaster is avoided

            isn’t, nobody does anything, and people end up dead or injured

            a small waste of time and resources is always a better outcome than possible death and injury

        • Crashumbc@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          13 hours ago

          there’s a difference, one is causing fear and panic.

          Same as running into a movie theater and screaming fire.

      • rooroo@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Very much depending on where you are. Pretending to commit or to have committed a felony (idk the minutiae of translations; Straftat in German) is one in itself over here. Fake it and instantly make it, yay!