🃏Joker@sh.itjust.works to People Twitter@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 2 months agoEvil company vs artistmessage-squaremessage-square56fedilinkarrow-up1723arrow-down17file-text
arrow-up1716arrow-down1message-squareEvil company vs artist🃏Joker@sh.itjust.works to People Twitter@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square56fedilinkfile-text
minus-squarepuppycat@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up13arrow-down4·2 months agoI’m not asserting anything, I was asking why he was asserting that it was definitively vandalism lol
minus-squareWhelks_chance@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·2 months agoIf they had paid for use of the wall it would be very easy for them to prove it’s not vandalism. They’ve never said they had permission, that I’m aware of. Can you link to them saying they do?
minus-squarezaph@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 months agoIt makes money to have a famous artist give them free art
minus-squarepuppycat@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·2 months agodude. as I just said im literally not trying to make a point, I don’t care enough to find a link or whatever. please get off my booty cheeks lmao
minus-squareangrystego@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·2 months agoThe point is we don’t know, so we can’t be sure it’s vandalism. We just don’t know.
I’m not asserting anything, I was asking why he was asserting that it was definitively vandalism lol
If they had paid for use of the wall it would be very easy for them to prove it’s not vandalism. They’ve never said they had permission, that I’m aware of. Can you link to them saying they do?
It makes money to have a famous artist give them free art
dude. as I just said im literally not trying to make a point, I don’t care enough to find a link or whatever. please get off my booty cheeks lmao
The point is we don’t know, so we can’t be sure it’s vandalism. We just don’t know.