• brucethemoose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    2 hours ago

    This is the last antitrust win we’ll get for years, isn’t it?

    I know Trump doesn’t like Big Tech, but I doubt his admin will punish them meaningfully, but just rail about censorship.

    • babybus@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      2 hours ago

      This isn’t a win I think. They are yet to meet in the court with Google.

      The DOJ will file a revised version of its proposals in early March, before the government and Google return to the DC District Court in April for a two-week remedies trial.

  • Auli@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Ehh just fight it for a month pay king trump some money and bam their golden.

    • SuperSaiyanSwag@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      36 minutes ago

      Seeing how tech illiterate some of these people are, I wouldn’t be surprised if that’s what ends up happening

  • TriflingToad@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    There’s literally so much else they should do, google docs, sheets, drive, phones, maps, earth, calendar, play store, translate, etc.
    Good work, continue please.

    • Kbobabob@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      What is the issue with docs, sheets, drive, phones, calendar, play store?

      There seems to be plenty of options in all of these spaces. Play store isn’t even on a lot of android devices.

      • BenLeMan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Correct. My example for another necessary intervention would be YouTube. That’s a space in which Google does have a monopoly.

  • Bosht@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Just…please for the love of whatever dirty do Microsoft. Fucking sick of their shit recently with One Drive.

  • kibiz0r@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 hour ago

    People wondering what Chrome has to do with a search monopoly:

    The obvious benefit is that they can default the user’s search provider to Google.

    But the more nefarious benefit is that, by controlling both the client and server, they can unilaterally decide the future of web standards. They don’t have to advocate for proposals, gain consensus, and limit themselves to well-supported standards the way other companies do. They can just do it, gain the first-mover advantage, and force others to follow suit.

    If they don’t like HTTP/2, they can invent their own protocol and implement it for their search servers and Chrome. Suddenly, using Chrome with Google Search is way faster than using Chrome with Bing or using Firefox with Google Search. Even if Microsoft and Mozilla don’t like the protocol, they now have to adopt it or fall behind.

    This has happened. QUIC was deployed in 2012. Firefox gained support in 2021.

    They’re doing the same thing with Privacy Sandbox, and you can also look at browser feature compatibility tables to see how eager Google is to force their own interpretation of every not-yet-finalized web standard as the canonical interpretation.

    Edit: Also, JPEG XL vs. WebP.

  • raynethackery@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 hour ago

    Yeah, see all this stuff happening between now and inauguration day. See, we did something. Too little, too late. If there are ever free and fair elections in this country, and the Democrats return to power, they better get their fucking shit together. The dismantling of the Federal government will be almost impossible to reverse.

  • 200ok@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    117
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Alphabet’s Chief Legal Officer Kent Walker, says the DOJ is pushing “a radical interventionist agenda that would harm Americans and America’s global technology leadership.”

    I’m honestly curious how this would “harm Americans”.

  • 200ok@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    53
    ·
    6 hours ago

    If they’re allowed to choose who they sell it to this won’t change anything

  • rockSlayer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    They should force it to become a worker cooperative. It’s the only solution that doesn’t allow for corruption

      • bdonvr@thelemmy.club
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        50 minutes ago

        For a lot of things yes.

        However I do not want to use a browser developed by the US gov tyvm

        • Grimy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          30 minutes ago

          My comment is more in line with the corruption aspect. As much as I think they deserve it, giving it to the employees would be more akin to them winning the lottery. In the space of a year, they will have gone public, shareholders would have stormed in and we would be at square one.

          Nationalisation at least has a chance of getting rid of the money corruption aspect. Sadly, the three letter agencies are probably deep in every browser already so I don’t think any solution takes care of that.

          I understand your point though. Personally, I will never use chrome no matter what happens, ha.

      • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Yep, nationalize everything that’s essential or at least offer a nationalized alternative and let the private sector try to compete.

        • Grimy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          31 minutes ago

          I literally salivate at the thought of it happening to the telecom industries.

  • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Admittedly, I don’t know enough about monopolies and antitrust laws to know how much this matters. Can someone ELI5 this and give us more info?

  • 52fighters@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    The Reuters article suggests prohibiting payments to Apple so that Chrome users on their hardware default to Google search. What about default settings to Firefox? Similar agreements finance a large portion of Mozilla’s revenue.