• Volkditty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    6 hours ago

    I’m pretty sure that having only one comma in that sentence is grammatically incorrect, but I don’t feel confident enough to be pedantic about it.

      • Volkditty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        See, this is why I hedged my bets. That wasn’t the comma that threw me off. I didn’t even see that one on first read-through. I was focused on the “the substance that, injected intravenously, turns women into cats!”

        • TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Yup! And “injected intravenously” could actually be done one of two ways: with commas (incorrectly done here) or with en- or em-dashes. For example, “the substance that – injected intravenously – turns women into cats!” (en-dashes) or “the substance that—injected intravenously—turns women into cats!” (em-dashes) are both valid. I often tend to prefer en-dashes because I think they’re easier to read than em-dashes and put more emphasis than commas on the idea that this is a bit of an aside. I think commas are just a bit too overloaded and that en-dashes add more flexibility to grammar.