• Dragonstaff@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Yeah, I’d call it heavy handed. It felt like it was a message first. Not as bad as the Daily Wire stuff, but going down that road. Even if I agree with the message, it felt contrived.

    Just my two cents though.

    • ditty@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 months ago

      Agreed. It came across as preachy instead of entertaining, but it seemed like it was trying really hard to be entertaining.

    • kameecoding@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      That’s what I saw on reddit only for a week later to see someone argue that it’s not about climate change because it’s literally about a meteor.

      So there you go, you probably weren’t the target audience

      • affiliate@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        it makes sense to me. if the movie was supposed to be about climate change, why wouldn’t they make it about climate change?

        is that something people do? make a comparison between two things, typically for the purpose of explanation or clarification?