• T156@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    No?

    At least in my experience, I’ve never looked at someone and wondered what their feet look like.

    Or realistically, what any covered-up part of them looks like.

    • saltesc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      7 days ago

      Without looking into the actual stats, it’s so incredibly common it’s normal. There are pedantic pros and cons to both; it’s trivial. But more people have a second toe shorter than the first.

            • sp3tr4l@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 days ago

              Sorry to rain on the parade… but ya’ll know that the prefix indicating something pertains to the foot or ankle is pod-, right?

              Podiatry. Podiatrist.

              Ped- refers to children.

              Pediatrician. Pediatrics.

                • sp3tr4l@lemmy.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  5 days ago

                  So I looked into this a bit and…

                  it appears to be based on whether a word is using Latin or Greek as its etymological basis, for words pertaining to feet.

                  In Latin… it is ped-… but in Greek… it is pod-.

                  … And, you are correct, English has a mish mash of both.

                  But also, a lot of English words referring to children use the Greek derived ped- or pedo- to refer to… children.

                  …Which is why in British English, the spelling ‘paed-’ is used, to minimize this confusion.

                  But us clever Americans dropped that, rofl.

        • Soup@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          From what I’ve been seeing I think a lot of shoes are just uncomfortable as-is. My longer big toe gets pushed around by the side of a slimmer shoe and shoes in generally aren’t quite wide enough around the toes for most people’s feet.

          • Dharma Curious (he/him)@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            7 days ago

            Shoes are fucking horrible. There is no reason we should be shaping our feet to match our shoes. It’s like a way less extreme version of Chinese foot binding, but it’s so common it’s insane. Bunions and foot pain aren’t normal, they’re normalized. Wide toe boxes! We need wide toe boxes!

            Thank you for attending my Toe Talk

            • callyral [he/they]@pawb.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              4 days ago

              Ok, this is an exaggerated (and badly drawn) drawing, but do people wear shoes like in option 2? Or do I just have comfortable shoes??

              Low quality diagram with a drawing of 1. foot in shoe, there is space in front of the toes; 2. foot in shoe, the toes are comically squished.

              • Dharma Curious (he/him)@slrpnk.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 days ago

                I’ve seen women’s shoes like that. But even picture 1 isn’t good for you. Your toes are naturally wider than the rest of your foot (take a look at a toddler walking barefoot sometime to see this). Toes splay to give us balance. Shoes that are like picture 1 or, God forbid, 2, push the toes to be narrower than they should be, causing crowding, overlapping, and bunions, among a host of other issues.

            • ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              edit-2
              7 days ago

              I have duck feet, and always assumed ‘wide’ shoes were just how a well fitting shoe was supposed to feel.

              Then I bought a cheap pair of barefoot style shoes, which often have ridiculously large toeboxes that some people avoid just due to how they look.

              It was nirvana; finally, a shoe that truly fit! I can never go back now.

              Also @Soup@lemmy.world, you might wanna try some if you haven’t!

                • ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  7 days ago

                  I started with these. Unfortunately only available on amazon, but they were an affordable way to try them, and they’ve been surprisingly durable!

                  Once I confirmed that I loved the barefoot style, I eventually invested in some vivobarefoot boots as well, and those have been fantastic. (If you go that route someday, look for them on eBay and wait for a deal).

        • Wrench@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          Wait, it’s bad for your back? Why?

          My lower back problems started pretty young. Never would have thought my stupid long long toes would be related.

  • Jarix@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    6 days ago

    My friend just had part of his toe amputated.

    Like an hour ago maybe not even…

  • proudblond@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    7 days ago

    My mom has longer second toes, and she always said “It’s a sign you’re descended from royalty.” She also said stuff like “An ancestor ran away with an Indian princess” and “We’re descended from Sir Francis Drake” so my mom, though I love her, does not have a fully-functioning bullshit sensor.

      • proudblond@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 days ago

        The toe thing was definitely a little tongue-in-cheek, but the other two she seemed to fully believe. When I pointed out that Drake didn’t have any children, or at least not legitimized, she acted confused and said it was something that the family had always said. Well… someone was bullshitting someone!

  • edric@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    7 days ago

    My own personal no-evidence theory is that if the person has particularly long fingers, their second toe will be longer than their first.

  • Futurama@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    7 days ago

    I’m a half and half. Left foot has a shorter second toe, right foot has a longer one.