We’ve been anticipating it for years,1 and it’s finally happening. Google is finally killing uBlock Origin – with a note on their web store stating that the …

  • underthesign@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Firefox needs to work on ensuring seamless compatibility with more websites, web apps and so on, because I’m personally very bored with my kids’ schools and related services sending out emails and forms with links that simply won’t open in FF but are clearly expecting Chrome or Edge where they work fine. Yes, this is on the lazy developers, but if FF want wider scale take-up outside of geeky niche groups then this is the stuff they must fix.

    • gerbler@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      53 minutes ago

      I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again. If your site doesn’t work on Firefox your site doesn’t work. As web developers your job is to develop applications for the web not for one specific browser. This goes double for essential services.

    • The Menemen!@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      23 minutes ago

      Can you send me an example? I don’t think I ever really encountered those sites and I use FF almost exclusively for ~20 years.

    • fxdave@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 minute ago

      Slack calls disabled for firefox users, but if you change the user agent to chrome it works…

    • realitista@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 minutes ago

      I encounter this very infrequently. I think I only have 1-2 examples at work. It’s not a huge deal for me to spin up a chrome for those one or two occasions.

      • Damaskox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 minutes ago

        I recall I didn’t get some sites working on Chrome either, when Firefox fails me 😅

    • tehmics@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      25 minutes ago

      Okay that’s fine, but when websites are effectively writing

      if user_agent_string != [chromium]
           break;
      

      It doesn’t really matter how good compatibility is. I’ve had websites go from nothing but a “Firefox is not supported, please use Chrome” splash screen to working just fine with Firefox by simply spoofing the user agent to Chrome. Maybe some feature was broken, but I was able to do what I needed. More often than not they just aren’t testing it and don’t want to support other browsers.

      The more insidious side of this is that websites will require and attempt to enforce Chrome as adblocking gets increasingly impossible on them, because it aligns with their interests. It’s so important for the future of the web that we resist this change, but I think it’s too late.

      The world wide web is quickly turning into the dark alley of the internet that nobody is willing to walk down.

    • yoasif@fedia.ioOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Firefox can’t fix all the broken sites in the world, but they do investigate issues reported to https://webcompat.com

      You can help by reporting sites that don’t work for you.

  • EarthShipTechIntern@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    When was chrome or chromium safe?

    Bloated memory hole in the last 10yrs.

    The way it goes about Sucking up resources convinced me to switch to Firefox completely long ago.

    • realitista@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 minutes ago

      Yes it was performance that first got me to switch too. But now I have plenty more reasons.

  • ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Honestly I’d say the Internet isn’t safe, and it’s because of Google, fuck you Google. It’s not just the wine I’ve been drinking, it’s true dammit.

  • irotsoma@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Also Firefox mobile has nearly all of the extensions as the desktop version so it’s more similar across all of your devices. Personally, I use LibreWolf on desktop and Mull on mobile, but they’re just tweaked versions of Firefox with some bloat and telemetry removed and preconfigured to be more private.

  • Brownian Motion@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 hour ago

    Opera GX has promised to keep MV2 in their code. So I’ll just keep using that until I see something different. The other thing is that Opera GX has built in ad-blocker which is pretty much on par with third parties.

    Firefox is not the “great browser” you think it is. It has had its fair share of fuckups and failures over the years, like laxed security certificate updates leaving users in limbo.

    Google didn’t come and just out do Firefox. It was the other way around, firefox fucked themselves with poor management and failure after failure, and people left. Chrome was the new boy in town, and that is why firefox is where it is today.

    Also, I would never use firefox, if I do need an alternative browser renderer, I use WATERFOX which is far more privacy compliant than firefix ever has been.

    • Madis@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      We will now [Oct 9] begin disabling installed extensions still using Manifest V2 in Chrome stable. This change will be slowly rolled out over the following weeks. Users will be directed to the Chrome Web Store, where they will be recommended Manifest V3 alternatives for their disabled extension. For a short time, users will still be able to turn their Manifest V2 extensions back on. Enterprises using the ExtensionManifestV2Availability policy will be exempt from any browser changes until June 2025.

      https://developer.chrome.com/docs/extensions/develop/migrate/mv2-deprecation-timeline#october_9th_2024_an_update_on_manifest_v2_phase-out

      So there is no single date for normal users, but June 2025 is fixed for enterprise (and expected date for Brave, Vivaldi)

      • Mwa@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        is ungoogled chromium affected i use that as a secondary browser for some extensions

  • geography082@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    People you can still block the shit of using DNS Adblockers . There are a some free like Mullvad DNS and Adguard.

    • oktoberpaard@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      3 hours ago

      That’s not as effective, since it can’t block anything that’s hosted from a hostname that also serves regular content without also blocking the regular content. It also can’t trick websites into thinking that nothing is blocked and it can’t apply cosmetic rules. I use it for my devices, but in browsers I supplement it with uBlock Origin (or whatever is available in that browser).

  • funkforager@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    11 hours ago

    You can make a windows registry change to have Chrome let you keep using uBlock Origin, with the V2 manifest. It will buy you six more months, basically the enterprise support period.

    There was a handy shortcut created by the Security Now podcast you can use as a one-click file to update the policy. The show notes also give a more detailed breakdown of what’s going on.

    The relevant section in the notes is page 10. The link to the file is page 12. https://www.grc.com/sn/sn-995-notes.pdf

  • reksas@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 hours ago

    After i uninstalled chrome some time ago, i noticed it had been slowing down my entire system even when its not on. There is nothing of worth in using it or any other browser derived from it.

  • ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    12 hours ago

    You can always keep Chromium installed for the odd site that doesn’t work in Firefox (my daily driver). I do web development and test in every browser and I almost never encounter sites or features that don’t work in FF. The only one I can recall is something in the Azure Portal, probably because Microsoft wants you using Edge.

    Typically, Safari is the laggard and any developer worth their salt would make sure their site works on iPad and iPhone. When a new web standard is released, usually Chromium supports it first but even then, not always. And web developers usually don’t use features that aren’t implemented across the board yet. I know I go to caniuse.com before I use something fresh out the oven.

    • Num10ck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      14 hours ago

      be sure to check out the extensions, there’s several that are game changers.

    • AlternateRoute@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      13 hours ago

      No, HVEC / H.265 codec support so no modern 4K security camera or plex/jellyfin etc high quality video support.

      • wax@feddit.nu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Probably no ads on your self-hosted frigate/jellyfin pages though, so you can just keep using chrome for that ¯⁠\⁠_⁠(⁠ツ⁠)⁠_⁠/⁠¯

      • vividspecter@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Jellyfin

        Use the desktop client or jellyfin-mpv-shim and you’ll get HEVC support and superior image quality.

      • ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        12 hours ago

        According to caniuse.com, it works now in the Nightly builds and can be enabled in other builds via the media.wmf.hevc.enabled pref in about:config.

        I use Firefox Dev Edition and I think it’s enabled there. But either way, you can enable it on stable.

        • AlternateRoute@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          10 hours ago

          Night, windows only, and needs to be enabled with about: config… ie it almost has some support maybe. Also doesn’t work via webrtc so it doesn’t actually help me with the viewing the security cam feeds.

            • AlternateRoute@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              4 hours ago

              Core web app compatibility vs … “enhanced” ad blocking. MS teams and some other business tools also don’t support Firefox but work fine in Chrome and Safari.

              It is something the Firefox team needs to work on again. I used Firefox from when it was released until Chrome came out and mopped the floor with it. At the time Firefox became the bloated beast and went through a reset.

              Unfortunately trying to have a firm stance on not implementing HVEC when they no longer had the largest market share was a bad move and they seem to be slowly back tracking on that.

              • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                4 hours ago

                MS Teams not working as well in Firefox is a “we want you using Edge or Chrome” Microsoft issue, not a Firefox issue.

                You wouldn’t believe the amount of enterprise-sector MS websites that have went from works fine on Firefox to completely broken on anything but Chrome very quickly after Edge became Chrome with a lick of paint.

      • bdonvr@thelemmy.club
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        13 hours ago

        plex/jellyfin etc high quality video support

        H265 isn’t the only option there. AV1 is great and fully supported by Jellyfin (and I imagine Plex?)

        • AlternateRoute@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          12 hours ago

          H.265 is the defecto standard on Security cameras, and I am not going to migrate content to AV1 that is already in H.265.

            • AlternateRoute@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              6 hours ago

              Not when you are using an NVR with scrubbing and everything in the web UI. https://frigate.video/

              All in all it would be an inconvenient workaround for something that already works seamlessly across Safari, Edge, Chrome etc.

                • shinratdr@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  5 hours ago

                  How is giving a sober and straightforward explanation of why he can’t use Firefox “bitching”? The simple fact is “switch to Firefox” isn’t a solution for everyone in every case. Burying your head in the sand about that benefits nobody.

          • bdonvr@thelemmy.club
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            12 hours ago

            Jellyfin can handle the transcoding to AV1 where needed. Albeit that’s a bit less ideal than direct play as you need the hardware to transcode.

            • AlternateRoute@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              4 hours ago

              Not spending hundreds to upgrade my server to support 4K to 4K transcoding. Even accelerated on a VERY recent CPU or GPU Encoding in AV1 is costly while at the same time decoding H.265.

              Again Essentially every major browser supports HVEC now, other than Firefox.

              • bdonvr@thelemmy.club
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                4 hours ago

                If it’s a personal machine in which you have a choice on browser why not just use one of the native Jellyfin apps?

                major browser supports HVEC now, other than Firefox.

                Every other major browser is an overcommercialized pile of crap (or built atop the same) that can afford to pay for the licenses to use HEVC or has no qualms shipping proprietary code with their software that they don’t control.

                Also apparently on Windows you can enable experimental HEVC hardware decoding support. You’ll need to install “HEVC Video Extensions” (from Microsoft themselves) ($0.99) in the Windows App Store and toggle “media.wmf.hevc.enabled” in about:config.