• DontTreadOnBigfoot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      1 year ago

      Same, but on the Pixel series. The rear scanner was so perfectly placed. My finger fell right onto it and it read so much faster than the stupid in-screen one is.

    • Something Burger 🍔
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t. Having it under the screen like Pixels makes it possible to unlock the device without picking it up.

      • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I take my phone out of my pocket and unlock it more often than I unlock it and leave it on a table, so the back makes way more sense

        Put your hand in your pocket, take your phone out, and it’s already unlocked by the time you look at it

        That said, why not both? It’s not that expensive of a component. Cameras cost far more and we’re fine having 3-5 of them on devices now.

      • nudny ekscentryk@szmer.info
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        In my experience (having used Pixel 7 nonpro for a while) it doesn’t always pick up your finger. Side-mounted (power button) sensor is the nice compromise imho