Noise-canceling robots to ‘mute’ loud conversations in cafe | What if we told you that we can actually silence a noisy table right next to us in a café?::undefined

  • K3zi4@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    75
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I’ve always thought phase cancellation technology could potentially be crazy revolutionary. Seems these guys know what they’re doing, but the real challenges come with high decibel levels if I remember right.

    If you tried to phase cancel out the sound of a jet engine, it would work and you wouldn’t hear it, but you could also have easily just burst your eardrums too, because the sound pressure level is still present, even if the actual sound is inaudible. It’s a crazy phenomena.

    Edit: the sound pressure level IS cancelled out by destructive wave interference, but if this is knocked even by a matter of milliseconds, the wave is doubled and that’s not good for anyone.

    Also, on retrospect, phenomena was poor word choice. It’s physics.

    • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      1 year ago

      Wait, what? Doesn’t phase cancellation actually cancel the waves? How can it be inaudible but still present?

      • vector_zero@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        1 year ago

        The waves are canceled (i.e. gone) until something goes wrong. You could end up accidentally causing constructive interference, in which case you my double the sound’s amplitude.

          • br3d@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            14
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yes - but 3db is twice the energy, which is what matters when it comes to damaging your cochlea

        • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I feel like this doesn’t happen very often though. I mean I wear sound canceling headphones all the time and I’ve never noticed it accidentally making anything louder. Then again, I don’t normally stand near jet engines.

          • K3zi4@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            I wouldn’t imagine noise cancelling headphones would have the ability to output high enough for serious damage. But some people do experience discomfort and pressure when using noise cancelling headphones for the first time, this could be due to a number of factors though.

      • K3zi4@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yes, sorry, I didn’t phrase that well at all. The sound pressure is actually cancelled out, but with the hypothetical example of the jet engine, anything going wrong could double the dB level instead of cancelling, and because we’re talking milliseconds difference, it would be quite easy to go wrong in this sense.

    • Pennypacker@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      1 year ago

      Besides what you mention, I have my reservations about ‘crazy revolutionary’. If I remember correctly, noise cancelling only works in one very concentrated spot where the waves are measured and cancelled out. If you move a couple of inches, the cancellation isn’t perfect anymore and does practically nothing. That’s why ANC headphones work well (always right by your ear) but any other open application seems implausible to me.

      • K3zi4@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Absolutely, this is spot on, but if they can find ways to work around this like with these microphone swarms they’re proposing, then there could be a lot more applications for it. Some quite scary.

      • LesserAbe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        You’re right. Without a demonstration I don’t believe it works. Could be a misunderstanding on the part of the author trying to interpret what the inventors are saying…

      • jimbolauski@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yes when the path between the noise and the noise canceling is out of phase the sound will be lower when they are in phase it will be amplified. Their canceling speakers will need to be very directional to stop this from happening

  • Steve@communick.news
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    What if we told you that we can actually silence a noisy table right next to us in a café?

    I’d say we almost certainly have different definitions of what ‘silence’ means.

  • LillyPip@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I’m super sceptical. Someone claims this every year lately and it always turns out to be bullshit.This is like the constant claims of free energy.

    Live press conference with demo or it didn’t happen.

  • Nonameuser678@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    As an autistic person this technology could actually allow me to access the community without being overwhelmed. This is revolutionary and would change my life.

    • cooopsspace@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Given that noise cancellation thus far as involved multiple microphones to identify background noise - yes

        • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Eh, everything can be used shitty, but it’s often more work to use a cool thing shitty than it is to just be shitty.
          Like you could do this, or you can put a cheap directional mic in the ceiling where it has free access to power.

          Being able to beat someone to death with a defibrillator doesn’t undermine it’s value as a life saving tool.

          • Ryantific_theory@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I mean, in this case all they need to do is attach data storage, and suddenly they have a massive data set of natural human conversation to sell to whoever’s training AI.

            • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Sure, but it’s still cheaper to stick a microphone in the ceiling.

              And if you’re looking for training data, there’s cheaper ways still.

              I’m not saying you can’t use this for evil, I’m just saying that it’s easier to do those same things other ways.

              • Ryantific_theory@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                I get what you’re saying, but what I was trying to get at was how a lot of these shiny cool things lately seem to be a way to easily package unwanted things. Google’s new AI integration openly reads and analyses everything you store and write in Google services, to assist you. People would be up in arms about slapping microphones around in public, but a public noise cancellation system that requires dozens of microphones constantly listening is just really cool.

                There are easier ways, but the fact that it’s cool sidesteps almost all the resistance. Same way facial recognition cameras covering the UK is talked about as method to only catch criminals, not something that tracks everyone that steps outside their home.

                • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I think your Google example is a good one, but for a different reason.
                  Google was already analyzing everything you stored and wrote in their services; they didn’t need to use AI as a cover for doing that, they just did it. They didn’t even need to hide it or pretend they weren’t.

                  Yeah, people probably wouldn’t like microphones everywhere. Unless you just call it a security camera, and then we don’t notice them.
                  Why invent a novel dynamic noise cancelation algorithm and robot platform when plastic dome technology is so well understood?

                  People are cheap and lazy, and even when they’re being shitty they’re not going to do more than they have to, or overly complicate things.

    • prole@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I was going to say, wouldn’t this require recording of literally every noise around you in order to cancel it out?

  • Hazdaz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Seems soooo much more complex than simply using regular noise canceling technology which we’ve had for ages now. In my previous company it was amazing how well it worked. You could be maybe 5 feet away from someone you could hear them perfectly fine, but move 10 feet away and everything was just muted down. One day we had some electrical problems and the system was down, and that’s when you really could notice how well the system worked because you could hear people all the way from the other side of the building when before when the system was running those noises were totally gone.

    • Sockenklaus@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      What you described from your previous workplace sounds amazing, but you must’ve used phase cancellation too, didn’t you?

      How is this so much different from what you’ve used back then?

    • DrMango@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Most office centers these days pipe in low-dB white noise to mitigate some of the chaotic noises of office work. Unfortunately if you’re the kind of person with a neurodivergence that makes you sensitive to sensory overload this could be one of the reasons office spaces make you feel so exhausted 😃

  • Opafi@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Saw the thumbnail and thought those were W40K minis and “muting the next table” would be everybody leaving the café as soon as you pull out some awesome orks and a measuring tape.

  • waterbogan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    The thing is, we dont generally needed the noisy table muted, we just need it reduced in volume enough at our own table so we are able to carry out a normal conversation

  • minematas@lemdro.id
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    The title is false. They are only microphones where a third party could tune into different conversations happening at a single table. This particular technology isn’t there yet to do noise cancelling on a room scale with specific zones.

    Researchers plan to eventually make microphone robots that can move around rooms, instead of being limited to tables. The team is also investigating whether the speakers can emit sounds that allow for real-world mute and active zones, so people in different parts of a room can hear different audio. The current study is another step toward science fiction technologies, such as the “cone of silence” in “Get Smart” and “Dune,” the authors write.

    • Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      As sounds is simply vibrations through a medium, it would be cool if you could set up some sort of box with a device in each corner where they make some sort of wall that disrupts any sound wave passing through. Like some sort of sci-fi privacy barrier. Might still hear things but wouldn’t hear words and whatnot.

  • embit@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    The cafes would not want that because guests are expected to leave and make room for new ones after some time. That’s also why they crank up the music in these places.

    • PetDinosaurs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Exactly. The restaurants are being made to be loud on purpose.

      Hard surfaces everywhere. Loud music.

      I’m tempted to get a decibel meter and threaten to file OSHA complaints.