criticism ?The thesis has been challenged and rejected by many historians, who see it as too simple an explanation for the complex series of events that occurred during the interwar period of 1918 to 1939.[2] In particular, some argue that, in describing the rise of the Nazis as an inevitable result of the Treaty of Versailles, the “Second Thirty Years’ War” thesis excuses Nazi rhetoric as being a defensive reaction to supposed British and French vindictiveness.[2] Rather, critics see World War II as a consequence of Hitler and the racist ideology of Nazism, and since Hitler’s rise to power was contingent on the Great Depression, it cannot have been inevitable, nor can his support have been a direct reaction to Versailles.[2] The Second Thirty Years’ War thesis is part of the larger debates over the causes of World War II and over the idea of a European Civil War.

absolutely no mention of anything happening outside of europe, fucking look at the founding of the league of nations and tell me the ‘two’ world wars arent connected