As Google tries to hinder ad-block extensions with their new platform Manifest V3, it seems to me Chrome or any Chromium derivatives are no longer a viable way to browse the web safely. So it got me wondering, how much big of a task would it be to still suport Manifest V2 on newer releases of Chromium? Maybe implement some legacy option for backwards compatibility with older extensions. I think it would be a great alternative to have, but I haven’t seen anyone coming up with something similar.

  • Shamot
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    26 days ago

    I think that using gecko based browsers like Firefox is the best thing to do in the short term. But having no competition is a bad thing. So supporting new web engines, like Ladybird, is important too: https://github.com/LadybirdBrowser/ladybird

    • Pup Biru@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      26 days ago

      yes and no… competition is good, but we do already have blink, webkit, and gecko… browser engines are biiiiig, complex beasts, and we do have competition already… more competition, at some point, becomes redundant

      • foremanguy@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        26 days ago

        Don’t think so, competition is good most of the time. Since Mozilla can be criticize with their browser and do not have the best engine, it could be good to have something else to compete with