• @pseudo
      link
      English
      22 months ago

      I meant statistically significant. Like in “how much chance is there that this difference was due to randomness ?”. There is statistcal tests for that.

      • Fubarberry
        link
        fedilink
        English
        72 months ago

        Afaik, there are only two dead Boeing whistle blowers, so you can’t form any sort of actually meaningful statistics on their life expectancy due to the small sample size. However it’s enough to say “that looks very suspicious and I think these ‘suicides’ should be investigated as murders”, and I think the meme is just meant to draw attention to that.

      • @pseudo
        link
        52 months ago

        Seriously !? Why is it so weird that I make a statistical joke on a meme that makes fun of statistics XD

        • @chatokun@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          22 months ago

          Didn’t see this till I posted the other reply. I’d say your first one looks enough like a joke, but the second followup makes it look like you’re serious.

      • @Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        22 months ago

        I mean, since the sample size is rather small, it’s not really possible to do a reliable statistical analysis on Boeing whistleblowers,.

        As a straight percentage, however, they DO suddenly die in their early 40s much more often than the general population, so might not be total happenstance 🤷

        • @pseudo
          link
          English
          12 months ago

          Yes XD I realised my mistake now