Lee Duna to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish • 5 months agoNightshade, the free tool that ‘poisons’ AI models, is now available for artists to useventurebeat.comexternal-linkmessage-square277fedilinkarrow-up1862arrow-down145cross-posted to: technology@hexbear.nettechnology@lemmy.worldtechnology@lemmy.zip
arrow-up1817arrow-down1external-linkNightshade, the free tool that ‘poisons’ AI models, is now available for artists to useventurebeat.comLee Duna to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish • 5 months agomessage-square277fedilinkcross-posted to: technology@hexbear.nettechnology@lemmy.worldtechnology@lemmy.zip
minus-square@MiaoulinkEnglish5•5 months agoProbably the reason they’re moving to a Web offering. They could just take down the binary files and be gpl compliant, this whole thing is so stupid
minus-square@Kusimulkku@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglish5•5 months agoI think that’s what AGPL tries to prevent
minus-squareladlinkfedilinkEnglish4•5 months agoYes, but if the code they took is not AGPL then this loophole still applies
minus-square@Kusimulkku@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglish3•5 months agoYes, I meant more that AGPL was created to plug this particular loophole. As in, if it was AGPL, they couldn’t do this.
minus-squareladlinkfedilinkEnglish2•edit-25 months agoThat’s true Although I personally am not a fan of licences this strict, MIT+Apache2.0 seems good enough for me. Of course, that might change with time and precedents like this 😅
Probably the reason they’re moving to a Web offering. They could just take down the binary files and be gpl compliant, this whole thing is so stupid
I think that’s what AGPL tries to prevent
Yes, but if the code they took is not AGPL then this loophole still applies
Yes, I meant more that AGPL was created to plug this particular loophole. As in, if it was AGPL, they couldn’t do this.
That’s true
Although I personally am not a fan of licences this strict, MIT+Apache2.0 seems good enough for me. Of course, that might change with time and precedents like this 😅