The long fight to make Apple’s iMessage compatible with all devices has raged with little to show for it. But Google (de facto leader of the charge) and other mobile operators are now leveraging the European Union’s Digital Market Act (DMA), according to the Financial Times. The law, which goes into effect in 2024, requires that “gatekeepers” not favor their own systems or limit third parties from interoperating within them. Gatekeepers are any company that meets specific financial and usage qualifications, including Google’s parent company Alphabet, Apple, Samsung and others.

  • @cm0002@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    98 months ago

    It’s quite literally well documented that Apple doesn’t want to support RCS because it pressures people to get iPhones. SMS is an ancient garbage protocol, what Google is trying to do is get Apple to support SMSs 21st century replacement and RCS support will fix literally every issue iPhone users have texting Android users. Broken group chats, trash quality videos, ultra compressed images, no reactions or stickers, threaded chats etc etc

    • kirklennon
      link
      fedilink
      128 months ago

      Google wants Apple to use Google’s proprietary extension of RCS, which runs on Google’s own servers as is precisely as open as iMessage. Effectively nobody uses the industry-standard version of it.

      • @cm0002@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        108 months ago

        Where’s the source for that? Last I read, Google was using the GSMA Universal RCS profile

        Google does own and run the Jibe platform as an RCS vendor, but Apple doesn’t need to use it. They can go with a different vendor or run their own RCS servers just as easily

        • kirklennon
          link
          fedilink
          108 months ago

          Google’s astroturf campaign for “RCS” promotes encrypted messages but RCS has no support for this. Google wants to force people to use its proprietary extension, which runs exclusively on Google’s servers.

          • @cm0002@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            98 months ago

            And absolutely nothing is stopping Apple from rolling its own RCS extensions that apps can support as well

            • @MDZA@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              28 months ago

              So what’s the idea here? Apple rolls out another extended version of RCS that’s proprietary as well?

              • @cm0002@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                58 months ago

                It might be proprietary, but at least any messaging app Android, iOS or some future third competitor will be able to implement it.

                Unlike iMessage which is both proprietary and closed off from third party use

                • @MDZA@feddit.uk
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  18 months ago

                  And yet, no developer other than Samsung has been granted access to Google’s version of RCS.

                  I’d love to see a truly standard, rich, secure messaging service, but I’m not convinced what Google is doing here is any better than Apple.

                  • @cm0002@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    48 months ago

                    The difference is, you can choose not to use Googles RCS extension and opt for the Universal Profile standard instead and it will interop with people on other RCS profiles, even Googles, just fine.

                    iMessage doesn’t do any of that, your choice is iMessage with other Apple users or a 30+ year old protocol. That’s it.