Fuck you reddit 2.0, took you long enough. Thanks though, we’ll stop seeing your crap posters pollute our comment section from now on.

90% of people we ban come from world. Very funny that they said they saw a rise of hate speech from our instance though considering the worlders we ban are fucking genocidal maniacs and fascists. You can check the modlog (it’s unfortunately federated), we are one of the tamest instances when it comes to banning people and deleting comments/posts.

For any worlder that was based and liked interacting with lemmygrad (you will notice we did not ban good faith participants), I recommend you make an account on a third-party instance that federates with us, like ml or ee until they also defederate from us because we have principles 🙃

Fuck israel, Palestine will be free a month from now mark my words 🇵🇸🇵🇸🇵🇸🇵🇸🇵🇸🇵🇸

On top of that, for the worlders finally breathing free again now that the scary tankies are away, you think the USSR wasn’t communist or whatever. You base that on whatever you’ve been taught in school. We’ve read things. We’ve actually gone beyond whatever our high school teachers said and looked into the USSR for ourselves. If you’re not cowards you will debate us about communism and “totalitarian” regimes, we’ll wipe the floor with you. Bet you don’t even know where the world totalitarian comes from or who coined it without looking it up.

And we retain our perfect track record of not blocking real instances while you further isolate yourselves from anything that might cause you some amount of discomfort. Really good democracy you got going there where wannabe tech bros instance admins decide for you what you’re allowed to see, must be those liberal values I hear so much about.

  • the post of tom joad
    14•9 months ago

    Libs debate without knowlege and get angry very quickly when it doesn’t work.

    Could it be that you, who have “looked into it” by way of being spoon-fed a couple recent articles, are wrong?

    Not only it that impossible, you also got so angry at the guy you were talking with you resorted to name calling.

    Your never brought a single link

    Shouldn’t you be ashamed rather than angry? Because this small exchange paints a pretty clear picture of your ass

    • @GiveMemes
      -1•9 months ago

      I never claimed they were beheaded, just dead, which has been verified at this point. It seems that you are the misinformed one here. Nobody else brought links either btw? Dunno why burden of proof is on me, but not “your side”.

      I insult because the people I’m replying to are sickening individuals that aren’t interested in debating in earnest and instead focus on shifting the goalposts and controlling the narrative in order to make themselves sound “right”. It’s honestly not worth my time and I (probably) won’t be replying again.

      • GarbageShoot [he/him]English
        8•9 months ago

        If you mean the same “40”, no, nothing has been verified that I have seen, with the IDF explicitly rejecting the request to substantiate their claim. Children certainly have been killed, but that targeted slaughter of 40 infants seems to be fictional, to say nothing of the means of killing.

        • @GiveMemes
          0•9 months ago

          Not referring to this whatsoever. I don’t gobble up IDF bullshit, just as I refuse to gobble up yours.

          • GarbageShoot [he/him]English
            5•9 months ago

            I think the equivocation is unfair. I’m not giving you any misinformation, let alone such blatant atrocity propaganda, am I?

        • @GiveMemes
          1•9 months ago

          So what claim of mine do you want sources for? This is called a double standard. Say it with me now

          Duh-bel stan-dard

          If they want sources for my claims they should ask me for sources on the specific claims I made rather than pointing out my lack of documentation in an attempt to undermine my arguments.

          • 新星 [they/them/🏳️‍⚧️]English
            5•9 months ago

            Off the top of my head, it would be nice if you sourced that we’re allegedly “cheering for mindless violence and the death of unrelated citizens”

            I don’t think anyone here specifically is calling for death of unrelated citizens beyond what is absolutely unavoidable in war. Surely you can understand the distinction here, as this is not calling for mindless violence but actually the end of it.