• @schwar2ss@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    network segregation. setting up vnets and rulesets for guests, iot or dmz and deploy them site-wide to all switches.

    • Nightwatch Admin
      link
      fedilink
      English
      29 months ago

      If you want or need that, you shouldn’t be looking at consumer products. I can configure wifi, ethernet and guest wlan and an additional set of public ipv4s , which is more than enough for end users. Anything more and it becomes too hard to manage and understand, and results in insecure setups. I built infrastructure for a living and I find Fritzes more than good enough for residential connections and they work extremely well, 7581 excepted, those were godawful crap.

      • @mholiv@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        39 months ago

        We just don’t want to be limited to fritz. You might be ok with the limited options but many are not. We should not allow the fiber exception here.

        • Nightwatch Admin
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -19 months ago

          You should definitely not go along with that fiber exception, I have a gigabit fiber connection where I can hook up basically anything that adheres to standards and regulations, and my ISP has been a strong proponent of that too.

      • @schwar2ss@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        3
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        What’s your point exactly? Besides telling me I shouldn’t use AVM hardware?

        I’m not using AVM products, as they don’t fit my requirements (e.g. network segregation). Ubiquiti makes decent prosumer hardware with their Unifi line and I’m quite happy with their offerings.

        An AVM user asked for potential use cases that FritzBoxes aren’t covering and I provided one.