• oce 🐆
      link
      English
      210 months ago

      Malthusian yes, eugenicist no.

        • oce 🐆
          link
          English
          1
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          People may make it eugenicist but the policy can not be. For exemple if the country gives money for the first child but not the second, you reduce the intentions to have more than one. Then maybe people will kill their baby because they want a blond girl but this is their fault.

      • acargitz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        410 months ago

        Fuck ecofascism. The problem is not how many we are. We are well within the planet’s carrying capacity. The problem is how the richest among us live.

        • @player2@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          5
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          Almost every modern human uses non-renewable resources and produces greenhouse gases either directly or indirectly. At the current rates it is unsustainable. It is the exponential growth of industry, technology, and human population that has caused the dramatic shift in climate change.

          The top 10% earning Americans (>$178,000/year) created 40% of the nation’s pollution according to a recent study. And that factored in the industries they worked in. That still means that the majority of climate change is caused by the activity of normal people.

    • JasSmith
      link
      fedilink
      010 months ago

      We can acknowledge reality without being histrionic. I’m not calling for an end to humanity. I’m simply explaining that human life is wasteful and inefficient. I think we should accept that, rather than pretending otherwise. Tinkering around the edges isn’t going to change the trend.