• Something Burger 🍔
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    17 hours ago

    I hope you’re paid well to spread this easily disproven lie.

    https://support.gog.com/hc/en-us/articles/212632089-GOG-User-Agreement?product=gog

    We give you and other GOG users the personal right (known legally as a ‘license’) to use GOG services and to download, access and/or stream (depending on the content) and use GOG content. This license is for your personal use. We can stop or suspend this license in some situations, which are explained later on.

    • WalnutLum@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      17 hours ago

      This is just the license to download the game installer, not to install it.

      Once you’ve downloaded the software they can’t revoke the license for that installer file.

      • Something Burger 🍔
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Yes they can. They cannot stop you from installing the game, but once they revoke your license, it would be piracy.

        GOG shills always twist reality to try to make it conform to the “you own you games” lie, but the truth is GOG is no different than Steam.

        • Azzu@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          16 hours ago

          How do you use a Steam game after its license was revoked?

            • Azzu@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              10
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              16 hours ago

              You’re purposely ignoring the obvious differences between GOG and steam to fit what you believe. Have fun with that

              • Mubelotix
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                15 hours ago

                The differences are practical, not legal. He is right in the end

                • Azzu@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  13 hours ago

                  Practical difference is all that matters in most instances. If a law cannot be enforced, it is irrelevant.

        • WalnutLum@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          16 hours ago

          They can’t, actually, because they don’t hold the rights to that content, only to GOG and the installer. Once it’s installed their distribution and license rights end.

          If the game you install has its own license from the rights holder that gets revoked then you’ll be in breach of that license, if anything.

    • Azzu@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      17 hours ago

      How do you disprove that this “GOG content” are offline installer files that, as long as you keep them backed up, work indefinitely even if GOG revokes your license to download them again?

      • Something Burger 🍔
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        17 hours ago

        I don’t. However, using those files after GOG revokes your license would be piracy.

        • Pup Biru@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          14 hours ago

          the reality of the situation is that these 2 things look exactly the same in 99% of circumstance and 100% of circumstances that consumers actually care about