Silverchase@sh.itjust.works to Math Memes@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 2 年前Proof by fucking obviousnesssh.itjust.worksexternal-linkmessage-square64linkfedilinkarrow-up1390arrow-down114
arrow-up1376arrow-down1external-linkProof by fucking obviousnesssh.itjust.worksSilverchase@sh.itjust.works to Math Memes@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 2 年前message-square64linkfedilink
minus-squarepseudolinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 年前 Then again, I thought 1+1=2 is axiomatic (2 being the defined by having a count of one and then another one) So I don’t understand why Bertrand Russel had to spend 86 pages proving it from baser fundamentals. It is mathematic. Of course it has to be proved.
It is mathematic. Of course it has to be proved.