Rappel que tous les pays coloriés sont aussi des autocraties, la seule différence est le degré

Yeah but “decentalised” here is not clear. Do you mean a storage that is not controlled by the instance ?

Centralized where ? Each instance is autonomous and independent

Blockchains are not decentralized, they are centralizing power in the hands of the people who develop the software for the networks. You can’t change code on your side, otherwise it means being incompatible with the network.

Blockchains are also a tool for building capital, which is an instrument of domination.

In short: blockchains are once again not a solution

I’m curious as to what is wrong with funkwhale ? It does have issues but it also seems to fit your usecase

Society isn’t fate. It doesn’t come out of nothing. Accepting/keeping the status quo is accepting the balance that exists, and it’s been going right for a dong time.

It’s not just about what you can or can’t do, it’s about where you’re pushing to

You must care about money in a capitalist world, of course; the real question is do you want money to matter all the time or not

A more interesting way is to understand that there is a difference between what is and how it affects us. The point isn’t so much to decide whether gravity exists or not but to make sure it doesn’t impose any unfair weight (ha) on some members of the society and not others. When we say “it’s just exists” we’re very close to say “there’s nothing we can do about this” and that justifies unfair situations.

Going against bilionaires is going pretty left though

Caring about money is taking a side though

The mastodon api, or the lemmy api, or the xyz api. Eagh platform has its own. Being public doesn’t make it standard, hence the “proprietary” qualifier

That’s actually what the first Zapatist did, inviting everyone at the table to discuss, hence the saying “mexican army”. That’s also what the makhnovschchina did.

Yeah if you want to do the same community it’s going to be harder, but if you want to make your own community with your own content and views it’s different.

Also, the history of the internet contradicts your point, communities have moved servers since the beginning, there never was a unique central point for everything. Lemmy is a bit inferior here because it only allows you to see communities one by one, but piefed can group communities into feeds that you can directly follow. By not placrng focus on a single one piefed can push for much more diversity

That’s because AP as it is implemented today is crap, it’s a superficial compatibility layer on top of a proprietary (as in, doing non-standardized stuff) platform. We need to take it on its head and make AP the actual core then build on top but that requires some work

Pro-capitalism garbage is putting me off, yet is everywhere. I like that it’s different, not everyone wants the same things

I like that communities/instances have opinions and go in a direction. That’s what make decentralization useful rather than one big average thing that always pushes towards the status quo in the end. Make your own community with your own rules without all-powerful overseers, that’s a system I believe in

No, I’m taking the data as it exists on the API …

We can see a globally slowly downward trend, probably not good but I’m definitely not equipped to analyze that

Then again if it’s some guy in his corner doing stuff on his own, is it really a community ?

Less talking, more action. If decentralized discussion is the basis for a healthy society let’s build that society, the tech is a means not an end