Europe, Russia, and China should get together and negotiate with Iran. If they propose a deal and Iran accepts, it will pressure Trump to accept. The problem with Trump is that he might be demanding too much. That’s the reason Iran says the US is not serious.

Netanyahu knows his actions are creating antisemitism worldwide, but he does not care. My proposal would end the conflict between Israel and Palestinians.

Egypt is not giving up the entire Sinai, only a part of it.

Israel can build desalination plants. The Sinai being a desert is a selling point because Egypt will does not have the technology to develop it. In exchange for desert, Egypt will be given fertile land.

It’s preferable for Palestinians to live under Egypt than under Israel.

The Palestinians in the West Bank will stay. The West Bank will be enlarged by land equivalent to Gaza since that will go to Israel. The Palestinians in Gaza will move there.

No, it won’t work. Starmer threw a state banquet for Trump in order in get him to lower tariffs. It didn’t do anything.

They will have to go somewhere. Under my proposal they will stay in the West Bank, but it will be controlled by Egypt. There will be no humanitarian crisis.

The British public might now side with Prince Harry who criticized Trump during his present visit to Ukraine. In contrast, King Charles is visiting Trump on Monday. I’m sure King Charles will cozy up to Trump.

Reminds me of the Vietnam War. Despite suffering heavy losses, North Vietnam continued to fight. The US, however, was racked by anti-war protests.

You have to be realistic, otherwise you will just get people killed. Look what Israel did in Gaza.

As part of the deal, Egypt could be given permission to access its new land through a specific land corridor. Egypt would gain peace on its borders. Continual fighting between Israel and Palestinian could cause a flood of migrants into Egypt.

Putin will never agree to pay reparations. The EU should simply be happy that the money is being used to stop Russian aggression. Hopefully that’s enough. If not, Europe would have to send in troops. Candidates for sending in troops are Britain and France. Too many European countries can’t send in troops because Putin would complain that Russia is being overwhelmed and must go nuclear.

In that case, raising the flag of the medal winners is political.

No, since I don’t know whether what Eurovision said is correct. I think it would be simpler for Eurovision to be like the Olympics in not allowing politics to be a factor in banning a country from participating.

Egypt would be giving up some up the Sinai not all of it. The US governs Alaska and Hawaii despite not being physically connected. Egypt will get peace at its borders. Also, fighting in Gaza and the West Bank could push Palestinian refugees into Egypt.

Show me where I approved of Israel killing 72,000 Gazans. My proposal would end the Israeli Palestinian conflict with no casualties.

According to the article, pro-Israel donors influence US politics. So, how would you stop aid to Israel?

I’m sure it’s against the law in the US for the government to control how a group of people spend their money.

The Gaza Strip and West Bank aren’t very large. It’s not Germany invading Russia or Japan invading China. The people in Gaza weren’t able to find a way around the IDF.

In my proposal, Egypt gives up part of the Sinai to Israel in exchange for Egypt getting the West Bank enlarged by land equivalent to the Gaza Strip which would go to Israel. What land would Jordan give to Israel?

How do you propose to get it from Israel?

A better analogy would be someone offers this person a vacant lot, in exchange this person would own the place I’m living in.