Oh, they tried to do this in sweden. They have promissed an examination of “wokeness” in higher education. They celebrated a university forbidding “any conversation a passer by could interpret as political”. They have not started it yet, and they just changed the guy that is supposed to be the anti-woke minister in this context after the summer. So we will share this journey.
I did not mean ‘left to block’, just ‘left in the feed’
Is it just star trek and linux left?
I think european liberals would rather work with fascists than even collaborate with the left, let alone call themselves “left”… oh, wait, they do.
What are the options here? Can I have them be only visible when printing? Does it mirror itself if I print double-sided? Maybe pdf does not support these things, but to me these are the important questions.
Note that he is not sentenced for the burning itself exclusivley, but all the context of his actions. For example, in his “critique of islam” as he probably would put it, he generalize it to “arabs and africans” and he, according to the court, insulted a person present at his demo “based on skin color and ethnic background”. As I understand it, this was a big part of his demos; go to a segregated area, yell insults at non-white people to try and make them angry. This is also what seems he is, at least partly, sentenced for.
Thank you! I wanted to make the link to appropriate section and I usually click the section in the toc to get it. But I could not find the toc on the mobile site.
I mean… That is not really what was puzzling about mercury. Its elliptical orbit, as predicted by Newtonian physics, was shifting a little each orbit. It was not a trick of the light bending, it actually moves “wrong” according to newtonian physics. He could have just read wikipedia instead of making stuff up to try and sound smart. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tests_of_general_relativity
Best deport all Swedish politicians in parliament in 1990: https://archive.nelsonmandela.org/index.php/za-com-mr-s-24 And the party that this minister is in was against supporting the ANC and Mandela. So I would not be surprised if this argument won’t move him.
They also want to deport for “bristande vandel”, “bad behavior/way of living”, which this probably will fall under. In their examples of what constitutes “bristande vandel” one is: being a victim of a crime. Robbed? Deportation. Raped? Deportation.
That is true. The swedish government is pushing quite hard to overfill prisons, probably in a long term plan to force it towards privatization. So I would not be surprised if it is even part of the plan.
But, also, I think one strategy suggested is just paying them. Threaten with prison, see at what price they break.
Oh, it is part of the Tor project even. Cool. Thanks. I will read the links.
How does this work? I thought WebRTC is UDP and Tor is over TCP. I don’t really know what I’m talking about here, but I’d like to know some details.
Yeah, there was always one broken on these fuckers
Is she the model for the Chumbawamba Anarchy-album cover?
This story is so bonkers in Sweden. The Liberal party wanted this law. They have since then, together with the rest of the right tried to blame it on the greens. And when they joind the government now, in support by the far right, they basically said they can finally abolish this tax. They are such a joke party.
Oh, a meme bashing marketing. That is a good meme market. You really got a sense for this stuff, I know, I’m in marketing. Now I will go home and dream happy dreams of how I market ad marketing strategies targeting children.
It was the Swedish social insurance agency with these parts of the recruitment process probably outsourced to the lowest bidder.
Not the interview itself, but… I had a personality test before the interview and it felt so fucked up. There were always two completely different statements of, at least to me, questionable morals. Like “I enjoy people’s envy of me having better things” and “In social situations, the conversation should only be about me”. Stuff like that, but not only egoistic statements. Then you had a single scale under the two statements which went from “describes me” to “describes me very well”, for both statements, no neutral option. Stated time was like 10 minutes, I took it like in an hour. An hour of having to think through if I should say that “not having sympathy for an abandoned dog describes me” because the other option was more horrible. Felt fucking traumatized after that.
It got me the interview, but not the job.
When you really have to look deep into god’s mind you just have to put templeOS on a supercomputer.