Because there are a lot more people, breaking news, and content on there compared to anywhere else.

Is this theory even falsifiable?

A few years ago I would have bought some stocks to support them … Now, I’d counsel anybody to stay away from that stock because the company could further alienate and lose most of their active users at any time.

Waste of money brains and time 😸

Worst: TLA

Best: WOMBAT

I remember how happy I was when I got rid of cable, where I had to pay for fox news and sportsball and ahost of other channels I never watched … which is now a very similar situation with every stupid streaming service.

… Again.

I didn’t even know that was a thing 🤷

Though all I care about VR is Beat Saber on my Quest 2…

Where is the fucking Talaxian tenderloin sauce?!?

I have plenty of folks in my circles who never read or reply to emails :p

I just started strange new worlds and it really took me back to when I watched stng for the first time.

Yes, thanks to Duo, this is exactly my level of Spanish :p

¡Felicidades a nosotros!

Sie glauben wohl auch, daß wir hier oben etwas altmodisch sind…

The click of death will come for them eventually :p

It used to be a piggy bank and peeps from many countries had no idea what that was supposed to be…

Und in dem SWR Report steht nicht ein Wort, dass das größtenteils Hirngespinste sind?!?

Ich fühle mich eher als Altbiene… Nachdem Studivz erst aufkam nachdem ich schon 5 Jahre mit dem Studium fertig war kenn ich die Terminologie auch nicht.

Die Grünen mit 2 Sitzen {5.5%} im Kreistag Stendal? Die sind Schuld?!

Ramen to that.

At least the headline is so bad it’s pretty obvious.