Debian dads of lemmy, join me in an approving grunt.

I don’t think it’s impossible that the underlying tech of LLMs will be evolved into something undeniably useful. But I don’t think “helping with Python” will be that.

I think on !fuck_ai I can suggest, you could also just learn the relevant bits of Python? Learning to express your thoughts in code and understanding the tools you use feels way more empowering than relying on blackbox-extruded code.

In my book socialism is about workers controlling the means of production, and historical socialists did not agree how that would work in detail.

Libertarianism on the other hand is primarily about the rejection of personal restrictions, stuff like: “I should be allowed to freely copy and share media I have legally acquired.” or “I shouldn’t be forced to pay taxes.” This individualist thinking makes it usually unable to adress structural inequality.

But he also literally has a book titled “Information Doesn’t Want to Be Free”.

That sure sounds like a zinger, but going off Wikipedia he does argue in that book for a loosening of copyright, which is pretty much what I meant. I don’t hate those positions though I’ll note they’re more libertarian than socialist. He has a whole personal freedom + monopoly control shtick, which works great for me in a lot of scenarios, but doesn’t quite work on GenAI tech.

You can call me exceptionalist, but I think LLMs stand out because the adoption of the tech basically requires very capital-intensive and thus centralized operations for model training. This makes whoever runs them (likely capital or a state) a powerful arbiter of information space, maybe best comparable with algorithmic feeds in monopolistic social media.

I think it is necessary to say: “Hey, we as a society shouldn’t run things like that. There are better ways of distributing information that work just fine.” A tech-neutral attitude can’t achieve that.

Funny horse-butt-creature notwithstanding, Dotcorows AI takes have been rather mid. Quoting from Guardian…

In this book, at least, he isn’t animated by the headline-grabbing concerns, whether existential risk or AI psychosis, deepfake porn or election disinformation, because those are unintended consequences. His target is the revenue model and the bubble it has created: “To be an effective AI critic, you need to strike at the source of AI’s power, which is the investment capital it attracts.”

He isn’t falling for AI doom and he is aware of the bubble, which puts him near the better end of the spectrum. But he’s also unwilling to fully criticize community damage resulting from LLM use. That may be because he’s fond of LLMs himself for his text editing and is repping the “it’s just another tool” defense. So he isn’t willing to go all the way when it comes to criticizing the global theft of labour that continues to power this industry. Information wants to be free, dontcha know?

You’re right. The grammer is right, but it still sounds off. Like, idk, someone fully capable of english leaving threats in his second language to be sneaky?

Je, wrong gramnar and the german feels totally off. Much too wooden amyway for a proper death threat.

I think he realized it too and sockpuppeted a better example. Check the comment by “Gerard”

I bumped heads here before on that take, but I can empathize deeply with these people.

I expect that interacting with most of them will be infuriating, since they probably accepted the “this is just how things are done from now on” narrative of AI and are some level of infatuated with the fancy demos.

But this acceptance is also where the inescapable soul-crushing comes from. If you can adopt an internal posture of resistance, the prevalence of AI is still grating but you can adopt a perspective that doesn’t devalue your own skill and makes personal impact conceivable. Many of these folks are pretty far gone, but a pipeline of recovery should be possible from a starting point like this.

The concept seemed interesting to me, but they did seem to enjoy making everything as complicated as possible.

I did find a CLAUDE.md when I was browsing their core repos a while back. That was only the web frontend I believe, not the core algorithm. Though it seems generous to assume they weren’t slopping up that one too.

Gonicus sind stabil

First time I heard of this guy, but this slaps! Main post material

Das musste ich 2mal lesen, befors geschnallt hat. Hoffentlich wird wieder seriösere Politik gemacht, wenn die Spaßparteien FDP, BSW & CDU außerparlamentarisch bleiben.

I just happened to watch the Heute-Show segment on the topic. (german late-night satirical news show, pretty decent takes usually but it’s no ZDF Magazin Royale)

It is nice that the doom claims by AI-CEOs are considered incredulous and their motivation is questioned (financial trouble, flagging product improvement). They certainly weren’t critical enough on some claims, e.g. the “AI hacking” incidents, let alone the inevitable dominance of AI tools. But despite that it was nice to see some sneering of the endless parroting of AI PR pieces that dominates german news.

Wernher von Braun is the way better comparison. Just maybe not one we like to make, since he basically got away with it and died an icon of U.S. space exploration.

Goering was pretty unapologetic at Nürnberg afaik, since he knew he was getting the rope.

Ich weiß ne bessere Idee für nen Thread.

Ich nutze aktuell Jellyfin als Musikserver und das funzt fein. Gibt’s andere auf Musik spezialisierte Medien-Server, die man sich mal ansehen sollte? Natütlich FOSS und möglichst Slop-frei!

Apparently they have the same sense of timing as the Blockchain Socialist guy, but he at least picked a brand that isn’t tied to the current hype cycle again.

Dann lass dir verraten, die betreffende Szene dauert ca. 5 Sekunden und passt zu keinem Zeitpunkt zum “editierten” Bild. Das herauszufinden hat kürzer gedauert, als die Antworten in diesem Thread zu tippen. Aber immerhin war uns nicht langweilig.

Kannst gerne versuchen den Frame zu finden, von dem das Bild editiert sein könnte: https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/how-do-you-do-fellow-kids

Beim letzten Absatz verliert er mich.

Tatsächlich könnte diese immaterielle Maschinerie als Ersatz für monotone intellektuelle Aufgaben dienen, neue Arbeitsplätze schaffen und den Arbeiterinnen und Arbeitern mehr Autonomie über ihre Zeit sowie eine stärkere Selbstverwirklichung bei/durch ihre Arbeit ermöglichen.

Ok Brudi.

Ich glaube viele klassische linke Analysten machen den Fehler, dass sie LLMs für eine rationale effizienzsteigernde Technologie halten, weil darin so viel investiert wird. Die Kapitalisten werden schon wissen was sie tun.

Und darum müssen wir diese Industrie, die gerade vor dem finanziellen Kollaps steht, nationalisieren und planwirtschaftlich führen!