That’s why you open a window with less embarrassing porn and leave it running in the background.

I don’t know if this counts, but I recently made a mastodon account for my original screenplay ideas and need some opinions on all of these: link

I fooled you guys, I wasn’t actually confident at all.

Not opening the article, but I’m pretty confident this is a real quote that was actually said and not a reference to something I’m not familiar with.

It’s still much worse than what you’ve written here! You used the word “while” when the word “because” is much more accurate.

Everyone is making this out to be a terrible thing for a candidate to say but I’ve dreamed my whole life about having an honest politician in this country.

I thought your post said compress with them and I was like what the hell does that even mean.

I remember thinking the Smooth Criminal cover wasn’t bad, but I was never interested in digging deeper on the assumption that a band whose one hit song is a cover that is worse than the original is probably not writing great music.

Am I allowed to also be nude when I squeeze through?

Open up pornhub, click a video. Starts to play.

I’m Kamala Harris and I approve this message.

I miss skippable ads more and more every election.

When I read the quote typed up above it’s clear as day that what she’s saying here is objectionable, but when I listen to her say those words in her voice, I’ve lost track of the plot before she’s done. Given that the OP is correct that Kamala was not supposed to say this, I have to wonder if she lost track near the same point I did.

edit: Rewatching and changed my mind, the point where I get thrown off is when she awkwardly tacks on “or a result of many things including” before finishing the sentence, which is likely just realizing midway through that she wants to tone down crediting the US for what’s happening there. The actual quote is more tempered than what OP has transcribed, she caught where it was going to go right before she finished.

So the statement that only an idiot would believe a word Elon Musk says has now been legally certified thanks to his own lawyers?

I hope there was a fanboy on the jury who tried very hard to push back on the other jurors that it’s not stupid to believe this stuff, before finally caving, being consoled by the fact that from the start he didn’t want Musk to lose.

edit: Actually, a funnier idea is Elon’s lawyers desperately trying to disqualify a fanboy from being a juror because the plaintiff’s lawyers have an expectation of what the defense will be so aren’t interested in doing that themselves.

Initially, we’d hoped to publish our endorsement on June 27, 2024, in the hours after Joe Biden’s first televised debate against Donald Trump. Then, we’d hoped to publish it a few days later, following Biden’s highly anticipated July 5 interview with George Stephanopoulos.

Now, on Oct. 2, 2024, we are finally…

A+

All of those factors and more are present in reality.

I didn’t know this! No one ever tells me fucking anything! Can someone tell me how I can reset my tech tree if I allocated my points all wrong? And also fill me in on the details of what factors the “and more” is referring to?

Fuck this education system, sick of this bullshit.

Just coming across this thread now I looked at the screencap and assumed it was being posted because another sockpuppet got outed.

Needing to use “The Le Epic prefix” is absolutely not necessary because it’s too much investment into regularly acknowledging and sharing an opinion on the dumb idea when you can just call it twitter like most people still do and be done with it. If you need to think of that as resistance, you still can! The guy really seems like the type to be more peeved about people ignoring his ideas than denouncing them.

You don’t need to respond to an instance of someone referring to the platform as “x” with a statement on how you feel about it, you can just call it twitter when you yourself talk about it. Whether it’s because you actually don’t care or because you want to be the change and all that, either way it will make your life a little easier.

It is reported for the first time that federal prosecutors are looking into the mayor’s dealings with five countries besides Turkey. The other countries are Israel, China, Qatar, South Korea and Uzbekistan.

Undoubtedly a dumb question, but what are these countries getting in exchange? I get that Israel is entrenched in our politics and has interest in maintaining that, but even for them there’s got to be a reason they wouldn’t just do this through AIPAC like every US politician.

Weepinbell

Not hornyposting at all when I say I need to see the american pikachu-redesign tiger with huge breasts and all the other design proposals from the american staff. Those sketches are historical artifacts and someone needs to dig them up and put them in a museum.

It’s the username created for the specific purpose of creating this post that gets me here. You gotta respect this person that named themselves “roommateirrational” for seeking sincere opinions on whether their roommate is being hysterical.