

UK here too and agree with the everything but the national insurance part is a common misconception. The amount you pay in national insurance has no direct tie to benefits or the nhs, and has not been connected for a long time.
All national taxes go into a big pot which the government allocates any way it wants in the budget. For example, the recent class 1 employers national insurance rate increase from 13.8% to 15% does not mean that increase in funding goes directly to the NHS.
The amount of years that you paid national insurance for in your life does effect the amount of pension you received. Once you’ve worked x number of years, you receive the full pension available. The amount you paid has no impact. In fact, you just have to have been paid a salary of the lower threshold, which means technically you don’t pay any national insurance, for that year to be marked as qualifying. Lots of owner managed business pay themselves salary of the lower threshold (£6.5k), then pay the rest in dividends - results in them meeting the pension eligibility for that year, pays no national insurance, pays no income tax, and then pays the lower income tax rate for dividends.
Fun fact, once you hit the legal retirement age, you stop paying national insurance even if you carry on working. This makes it a regressive tax!
Successive governments have not made this clear because it is politically easier to raise national insurance rates (“helping the NHS”) than income taxes, even though income tax is a more progressive tax and it all goes to the same pot.



















Really sums up the situation well, although it’s interesting that his co-hosts on the News Agents weren’t able to offer the same challenges or journalistic questioning of a sitting Government Minister (who is incidentally involved in scrapping of juries). Jon Sopal even offered up a comment about “the hate marches” himself, which doesn’t seem right.
I live near Epsom and felt terrorised by the far right riots recently taking over the high street and trying to invade a random house that turned out to be an adult refuge. Why aren’t the people who are literally filming themselves doing the same all over there UK being proscribed?
Ever since 9/11, Muslims have been targeted, vilified and called terrorists in the UK. Even those not involved at all were expected to “look within” and we had the travesty of Prevent. I completey oppose this form of thinking but why isn’t the Jewish community being held to the same amount when we know they have hosted ex-IDF soldiers in this country and British citizens have, completely openly, joined the IDF and committed war crimes. Going to “defend their homeland” is fine is it for them but a 15 year old who was groomed online to join what she thought was a fight for her homeland is stripped off all citizenship and left to rot in a refuge camp abroad. Again, I do not condone their actions but it just shows what the State can do when it wants to.
It is the double standards and hypocrisy that really stands out in all of this. We should be doing our best to stop all violence against anybody - violence by a British backed state against children using weapons that we know passes through our country, violence against any Jews, Muslims or any other religion in this country, violence against refugees, violence against women, and so on