Sorry I don’t speak academese. It’s conservative in the sense that Zionism chose to conserve reactionary ideas in favor of perusing a more libratory political path that was available at the time, while using the cloak of progressivism. Herzl himself said he wanted to use Marxist economics in the new Jewish state even though I have no idea how you can use Marxist economics without pursuing liberation for all. As I said I couldn’t get past the first couple of pages of Judenstaat because it pissed me off.

Creepy article. I never trust people building robots.

Fascism isn’t just a term for people doing bad things though I hate to be that guy, but it was a distinct movement that started in the 20th century. Doesn’t excuse any of the atrocities committed but colonialism was initially carried out by European monarchs most white people didn’t get to vote for that. White people were constantly reconstituting their philosophical systems to explain why they actually had the right to enslave and exploit people. Shit goes back to the ancient Greeks.

Idk some stories in the Bible are okay, I just see them as stories though.

Sadly Zionism always assumed the displacement of other people, so that some could build their paradise, it also gave up on the idea of building paradise together with other people, rather then a walled garden just for a single people. It’s a fundamentally conservative ideology that assumes that the basic principles of the enlightenment that all people are equal, and that people have the ability to change are false. Read Judenstaat by Herzl I found it to be a very cynical take on things and I couldn’t finish it.

His point isn’t that stupid though, would you rather be 70 and have grown up in Gaza or be 70 in a none apartheid state. Obviously everybody wants to live as long as possible. Either way I kinda don’t care about the 1940s and why people are so obsessed with arguing about them is beyond me especially since I’m not an academic. We have our very own unique set of political problems we have to deal with now.

Well the USA and Britain weren’t fascist though they were bourgeoise liberal democracies like Dessalines said. Francoist Spain was fascist, but with a more Catholic bent as opposed to Nazism which wanted to create a weird neo occult religion.

Sometimes I wonder what it will take to get people using the web less.

True I was just thinking about the music side of things

Aren’t they just one guy.

The whole war was sadistic.

That isn’t limited to right wing or far right groups. Plenty of liberal Zionists who are still hiding behind the anti semitism claim. I guess admitting that you spent most of your life shilling for apartheid and genocide must be tough.

Crypto

No I’m just asking whether they were psychopaths as well? Or if you’re just an anti communist.

Lol. You do know that France and UK didn’t want Germany to reunify right. Where their leaders psycho as well?

https://direct.mit.edu/jcws/article-abstract/27/2/4/131515/Britain-s-Opposition-to-German-Reunification-1989?redirectedFrom=fulltext Edit: What’s your opinion on Merz BTW?

So you think all the leaders of the USSR and DDR had impaired empathy and were egotists with who showed no remorse?

Ok.

The lady who got shot in Minneapolis.

I didn’t get that from the article. It is definitely fucked up that they lied but it didn’t seem like they were doing it for sadistic reasons.

Just want to point out that Mussolini was an anarchist, and he was considered an opportunist by many before he swapt sides.