• 1 Post
  • 57 Comments
Joined 3 months ago
cake
Cake day: July 7th, 2025

help-circle
  • There could be many reasons to be opposed to it, not necessarily racist ones.

    You can support the rule of law - that’s not racist. You may want to support legal immigration, while closing illegal ways that commonly lead to abuse of migrants - this is straight up progressive. You may consider illegal immigrants more dangerous as they didn’t go through screening procedures - that’s up for debate, but not necessarily racist, etc. And generally, if you consider that same rules should apply to everyone, this is not racist.

    However, it’s worth considering the laws of your area and the way they can affect legal migration. Going against illegal immigration and at the same time voting to complicate legal one, especially in relation to certain nationals, likely signals of racism (or, rather, ultranationalism). It is one thing to want to make the process transparent and legal and the other - to build more barriers.






  • Nah, OpenSUSE/Fedora require very little maintenance too - the only thing separating them from Mint is more knowledge required to set them up the right way. Terminal has more use there.

    So, I’d expect you to confidently operate either at home without much work. You have competence, and neither requires your constant attention.



  • Which is exactly what OpenSUSE/Fedora have to offer. It just works and doesn’t get in the way. The only real difference between them and Mint in terms of user experience is that they require some more proficiency with the terminal and experience with Linux overall and do not assume user to be a complete newbie.

    So, you’re on the right track with Mint. It holds to nearly the same philosophy, and offers you the tools you may find useful as a less proficient user. Keep it up!


  • As someone who ran Manjaro as my first Linux for 1,5 years, it’s a breeze to set up and everything just works…until it doesn’t.

    What screws it is that eventually, over time, something goes wrong. Something breaks here and there, new bugs appear, and without Arch proficiency that is not really expected of a Manjaro user, it’s next to impossible to track it down. So, eventually one has to reinstall.

    I’ve been a strong Manjaro proponent back in the day, but now I see its flaws, unfortunately. I wish it could be a great option, though.





  • If you often find yourself in a position when you can’t troubleshoot issues yourself, CachyOS might not be the perfect option. It’s Arch far and wide, iirc since I tried it about half a year ago, it doesn’t even feature something as basic as the app store, and is heavily terminal-based. Considering how many diverse issues Arch can create, this turns into a nightmare very quickly.

    Currently, I ended up running OpenSUSE Tumbleweed on my machines.

    • It’s an OG distro, so no fork issues
    • Has decently large userbase
    • Is nearly as bleeding-edge as Arch
    • At the same time is rock solid thanks to advanced automatic package testing
    • Does not brick your system upon poor update
    • Has good and user-friendly documentation (that can be understood by non-nerds, unlike Arch Wiki)
    • Unlike newbie-friendly distros, does not assume user is an idiot and gives all power at your fingertips
    • Has btrfs and snapper properly set up by default to easily revert most mistakes you can make

    So, generally, this is the peace of mind rolling release distro that just works, doesn’t bother you too much and at the same time allows you to spend as much time under the hood as you like. You’re unlikely to break anything, you can always revert if you do, packages are well-tested and unlikely to cause issues, and on this solid foundation, you can do anything you like.


  • Absolutely. Americans, Israeli, Russians are all regular people caught in the crossfire. There are some shitheads in support of their governments, and there are plenty more of those who reject it and will happily join the opposing forces, uniting internationally over the same goal.

    And outside of political lens, people are still the same as they were a year or two or three ago. It’s just that different political circumstances highlight particular kinds of people.




  • Been around chickens quite a lot, and around cows a bit. Chickens don’t produce nearly as much methane as cows, chicken manure is an excellent fertilizer, arguably even higher quality and lower footprint than cow, their food consumption even per unit of mass is quite small, they don’t take much space, and overall, they’re relatively easy to work with.

    That said, plant-based options are even better in that respect.



  • I’d argue voting system is overrated.

    I had quite a few comments downvoted into oblivion because my opinion was unpopular in some corners of Lemmy.

    Like, go ahead and make a same political statement at .ml or .world, or come to some specific community to argue against the OP.

    Or, in reverse, there are plenty of examples when hateful or wrong BS was upvoted to infinity.

    I’ve seen this again and again with others, and I can confidently say voting is not a good metric for reason.