I think what they want is a very specific outcome, and they would prefer to be the ones that bring it into existence, but they’re also ok with the other party doing it as long as the outcome is achieved. They want to win, but they’re ok with losing if it means the larger project remains on the rails.
They’re probably doing it so that you have to stay on their search engine result page, this drumming up more ad impressions.
I think it’ll be very close but Kamala will win. I think she’ll barely squeak by in Pennsylvania and Wisconsin, Trump will barely win Georgia, she’ll win Michigan and Nevada more solidly, and Arizona will go for Trump. I think this outcome will be less of a reflection of support for Kamala and more of a loss in enthusiasm for Trump this time around. This is a group of people who have been told over and over that the vote is rigged, therefore their vote doesn’t matter, and being generally lazy, they may be looking for an excuse to just stay at home.
I say this fully expecting to be proven totally wrong in a month and therefore be completely owned, but that’s what my gut tells me now. It really could go either way.
Museums are about preserving the authenticity of their subjects. In this case, that means preserving the look and feel of playing a game as authentically as possible, which means running it on the original hardware. This isn’t just hypocritical considering their stance on emulation, it’s bad museum curation.
Makes sense, thanks!
Ah, I see. Thanks!
I doubt this is real - why would it have been written in English? Did the hackers say they translated it? Seems odd.
“Now let’s burn down the observatory so that this never happens again!”
👨🚀🔫👨🚀
Why did she say “but you know, anything’s possible”
The joke of the trend is that the person points out that they’re at an event that would be unlikely to play hot to go and then smash cut to the song being played
How did whatever social media intern that put this together misunderstand the comedy of the trend they were imitating?
Who’s joining me in Corsicado?
I personally think astrology is destructive to the people who take part in it. I see a lot of arguments along the lines of, “people have fun with it and it gives them comfort” etc. and if that’s all it was, that would be fine, but anyone who’s met someone really into astrology can see that it primes people to apply a totally illogical and incoherent framework to problems in their lives. The problem with that is that you’re never going to grow and learn as a person if you continually grab for this totally illogical tool in your emotional toolbelt every time one of life’s challenges arises. You’ll never reflect on the emotional genesis of a lot of your feelings or responses to the world if you just think, “I did that because I’m a Leo” or whatever. You’ll never get to, “I realize now that I responded to x situation negatively because y factor happens to be a trigger for me and I need to be conscious of that in the future” if you never get past “I responded to x situation negatively because mercury is in retrograde.” Overall I think it’s a toxic trend in our society that prevents people from being able to grow in a healthy way.
How does astrology explain two different people with the same birthday having radically different personalities and traits?
Under the reproductive rights section:
“ Vice President Harris has traveled America and heard the stories of women hurt by Trump abortion bans. Stories of couples just trying to grow their family, cut off in the middle of IVF treatments. Stories of women miscarrying in parking lots, developing sepsis, losing the ability to ever have children again – all because doctors are afraid they may go to jail for caring for their patients.”
She heard stories, folks. She’s done the work. No mention of actual legislation she would put in place to ensure reproductive rights, but she’s heard the damn stories. What more could you possibly want from her.
That isn’t even remotely what he looks like.
Ah gotcha. In that case
ahem
I HEARBY DENOUNCE VIOLENCE IN ALL ITS FORMS.
Alright, with that out of the way, Eve Barlow, may I please continue voicing protest against the slaughter of thousands actively occurring right now?
Am I correctly understanding that what she’s saying here boils down to “you are hypocritical (antisemitic) if you only care when children are killed in apartheid within the occupied zone, but not when they die of other causes in an imaginary region of Palestine that’s not under occupation”?
A newt?!
How does calling for the shutdown of a human rights center not indicate to you that you’re on the wrong side?
Has Nintendo ever had the entire rom of a major game leak before it was released?