In my state at least millions in federal funding goes towards projects. Day to day operations are funded by state tax dollars and they still want people to pay ever increasing prices for public transport.
Honytawks argument further falls flat when you consider tax dollars do go to public transport.
Edit:clarified state tax vs federal
Actually on the side of law enforcement here, accuser has to provide burden of proof. It’s pretty hard to prove how stupid and ignorant someone is or is not. Edit: It would make defense by ignorance the default plea and abused horrendously.
Only thing I think law enforcement gets wrong is THEY are allowed to take the defense of being ignorant of the laws they are supposed to be protecting. If anything a cop wrongfully charging someone with an offense and then admitting they didn’t know what they were talking about should result in a larger punishment for them, not less.
Idk who you are referring to in this reply. The coworker who says you have to drink coffee black is the one who is going to notice if it’s burnt. So are you supporting them or against them?
My question is, Are they brave enough to do the airport scene from MW2?
You say valid but they tried to share a vice article. I think the ban was justified but the mod had to give a believable reason /s
I really thought smug ideology man would be a character bit where the comics would be incredibly bad takes and there would be a smug guy involved. The audience would find humor in him being so smug while also just wrong. These are just your takes which are mostly reasonable and I don’t get why it’s called smug ideology man unless you’re the smug one?
Probably due to the issues surrounding the US vs indigenous people. Indigenous people were depicted as savages that scalped people yet at the same time scalping an indigenous person was a source of income yet somehow didn’t make colonizers savages.