InevitableSwing [none/use name]

  • 1.77K Posts
  • 5.04K Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: March 19th, 2022

help-circle
















  • For Fox News viewers it’s 82%. I’m Jewish so I was curious about this…

    Four in ten Jewish Americans (39%)

    Great just great. The lessons of the Holocaust have already been forgotten by American Jews.

    Source

    Challenges to Democracy: The 2024 Election in Focus - prri.org

    […]

    Rounding Up Illegal Immigrants into Militarized Encampments

    Americans are divided over support for a policy that would round up and deport immigrants who are in the country illegally, even if it takes setting up encampments guarded by the U.S. military (47% favor, 50% oppose). Nearly eight in ten Republicans (79%) favor putting undocumented immigrants in encampments, compared with 47% of independents and 22% of Democrats.

    The vast majority of Americans who most trust far-right news (91%) or Fox News (82%) favor militarized encampments for undocumented immigrants, compared with 44% of Americans who do not watch TV news and 36% who most trust mainstream TV news.

    White evangelical Protestants (75%) are most likely to favor militarized encampments for undocumented immigrants, followed by the majority of white Catholics (61%), white mainline/non-evangelical Protestants (58%), and Latter-day Saints (56%). Among non-white Christians, around 47% of Hispanic Protestants, 42% of Black Protestants, and 33% of Hispanic Catholics favor this policy. Four in ten Jewish Americans (39%) and around three in ten unaffiliated Americans (32%) and other non-Christian religions (30%) also support militarized encampments. More than half of Americans who attend church weekly or more (57%) or at least a few times a year (51%) favor putting illegal immigrants in encampments, compared with 41% who seldom or never attend religious services.

    Around seven in ten Christian nationalism Adherents and Sympathizers (71%) favor militarized encampments, compared with fewer than four in ten Rejecters and Skeptics (37%).












  • Bob Woodward’s new book, “War,” might not be dispositive in representing Biden’s strengths and weaknesses. The book does add weight to this thought experiment, though. Woodward paints a very positive picture of Biden’s ability to lead and to govern despite making mistakes, most notably the disastrous withdrawal from Kabul.

    The fucking ghouls.

    Woodward also reports that Biden’s obvious decline was physical and not mental.

    What the fuck. A stutter is not a load bearing wall for a tall building.

    For some reason, the Harris campaign has downplayed this conviction and his three other pending cases, as well as Trump’s major character flaws.

    The “some reason” is that it’s an electorial loser. Voters who are voting for Trump tune it out. And people who are voting for Kamala or are considering voting for her - might want to know other stuff even if it’s just superficial details of her plans as president.

    And with the death of Hamas leader Yahya Sinwar, Biden now has an opportunity to help conclude a peace agreement in the Middle East. That would be Biden’s legacy. One hopes he will pursue that opportunity.

    What’s worse than baby brain? Dropped on his head baby brain?

    Harlan Ullman, Ph.D., is a senior advisor at the Atlantic Council and the prime author of the “shock and awe” military doctrine. His 12th book, “The Fifth Horseman and the New MAD: How Massive Attacks of Disruption Became the Looming Existential Danger to a Divided Nation and the World at Large,” is available on Amazon.

    I wonder what the Atlantic Council pays him every year for his shitposts. And who is this dipshit?

    Harlan K. Ullman

    Theories

    Ullman was the principal author of the doctrine of “shock and awe” that was a product of the National Defense University of the United States. This concept is technically known as “rapid dominance” and is a military doctrine based on the use of “overwhelming decisive force,” “dominant battlefield awareness,” “dominant maneuvers,” and “spectacular displays of power” to “paralyze” an adversary’s perception of the battlefield and destroy his will to fight.

    He additionally theorized that Russia would never invade Ukraine, but was later proven wrong within 2 weeks.