Huldra [they/them, it/its]

  • 4 Posts
  • 464 Comments
Joined 4 years ago
cake
Cake day: October 7th, 2020

help-circle

  • I’m sorry but this is just wishful thinking and active whitewashing, sure he doesn’t say Sinwar individually killed 1,200 “innocents”, but he says Sinwar masterminded the attack that killed 1,200 “innocents.”

    The only way history will show that Bernie had a good heart is if someone donates him a new one, where is the good heart in calling IOF soldiers innocents? He is treating Israelis as ontologically innocent.




  • That literally does just look like what people do when hunting if they aren’t interested in doing anything with the innards, it’s simpler to get everything out right away so that there’s no risk of contamination.

    I’d say that assuming this is near a regular walking route its definitely some extremely bad manners from whoever did it in that case though. It’s one thing to leave stuff out where it’s safe to assume other animals will get to it, but near where regular people walk is nasty.

    Apparently there isn’t supposed to be hunting around there, but the alternative scenario in that case surely would be that some other animal carried it there or whatever. What sort of supposed satanic ritual just coincidentally leaves a set of internal organs that look identical to when a hunter is trying not to puncture anything and get nasty organ stuff all over?


  • I think this kind of anti-African panic has been long simmering in the UK too, I recall reading about a 2002 case where the remains of a young black boy were discovered in the Thames, and the “loony” opinion was that it was satanists, while the measured and reasonable opinion printed in shit like the Telegraph was that it was probably “African witch doctors”

    Aside from that, the organs in the attached photo just actually look intact and relatively unremarkable aside from not being inside of an animal, surely the only thing you could test for in that case would be if stress hormones or similar are built up, which could be any kind of pain and stress, or like if they find weird poison in a stomach?







  • I’m probably a bad person to try and explain what to look out for in the remake compared to the original because I think the remake fundamentally has boring generic design for the gameplay. I think the original game has a unique experience with the atmosphere and the general traversal of the world, with the camera oftentimes deliberately forcing you to head towards unknown areas that you can’t fully scout ahead of time, and a lot of the moment to moment scares within the gameplay rely on that, also it uses wide angles to emphasise isolation in a lot of the outside areas while using close ups to emphasise the cramped indoor spaces.

    As far as the combat gameplay goes it does seem like that’s more of a draw for you so I definitely see how Signalis would work better, and the new remake might work better just by virtue of following very blatantly in the footsteps of RE2 and RE4s remakes with tactical locational damage as a pretty critical part of crowd management, from what I’ve seen.









  • I think strictly speaking while Pontius Pilate orders the crucifixion, there’s also supposed to be several points where Jesus could have been saved, like when Barabbas a violent criminal is pardoned instead of him at the request of the people.

    My gut feeling on the whole reasoning is that partially it’s the attitude of like, Jesus is supposed to be of their people but they betray him, while the Romans are acting as occupiers naturally would. And also the Romans are forgiven by reason of adopting and spreading Christianity, while Jewish people remain Jewish.

    That’s basically the logic that is used for this strain of antisemitism.