

This is an outcome I’ve pondered on. Say a split happens, and the large number of lemmy.world users remain there. That community would still be large enough such that it could hypothetically be treated as a separate sector of lemmy, completely cut off from the other communities, but large enough to keep its own.
Only some instances will be able to bridge the gap of this, and tap into both pools (lemmy.world & everyone else) by playing the neutral game. Eventually, things will happen that can push those shared instances further to one side, eventually hostility from the opposition and support of the nearer side brings them together. And yet, the problem remains unsolved, the split still festers. Who knows though, maybe lemmy.world is entirely supplemented by new communities in this new space that’s formed, and leads to the bulk beating the powerful.
Dipping into political theory: In some ways, it almost seems to mirror a power struggle, I view it similar to the population vs powerful. Lemmy’s decentralization makes for a somewhat ‘anarchist’ technology, and this hypothetical seems to allure me, as it seems representative of real struggles a possible anarchist society could/would face when a group grows to be ‘too powerful’. The internet is not a mirror of real-world society, but I feel the comparison is hard to deny.
Edit that’s halfway relevant: Could someone point me to some guidelines, or policies, etc. about creating a community on this instance? I’ve had two on the mind that I dearly miss from Reddit, and consequentially haven’t felt I can share content that’d pertain to them.













That is interestin’, it is. In retrospective, it makes a lotta sense that these groups would form and spat at one another. I had a massive cloud in the head about why X community seems to dislike Y instance, and yet Z community talks ill of X and Y, and it’s just a whole mess. I hadn’t considered that to be because of a split like this, as of yet.