• 56 Posts
  • 473 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 20th, 2023

help-circle

  • I don’t like this argument.

    You’re advising

    "not pursuing or discussing what the truth might be, because of political opponents".

    Political opponents who want you un-existing either way, and will use any excuse and lie available to barely mask that hate of theirs.

    Neither those people’s “understanding”, nor their amount of available means to mask their hate, really affects trans people’s freedom.

    The "average Joe" can't be "won over" either, because they don't care. Until something happens, to make them care. Like an a acquaintance or loved one being involved.

    But in the off-chance that they can, (without being personally affected), they will be won over by recognising a truth of the world.

    Victory by “reasonable vibes”, is achieved by reaffirming what’s already in someone else’s head. It’s only a victory if you’re trying to not change something.

    So seek the truth. Don’t appeal to the good nature of the oppressor.

    (tap)

    for more, at least in Jerboa.




  • I mean, in an abstract sense your concern is valid, but, at least how I see this case, this racist dogwhistle is very fragile, in order to stay discreet, and the meme is very low-stake to use.

    The “battle arena” is also the chaotic “meme market”, where there is much less top-down control too, and individual idea virality reigns king. That is to say, as long as you explain your idea well, as long as your meme “hits a nerve”, it will spread either way.

    To be exact about what I think, I think we should do both: 1. Use the meme as a meme, because it’s fun and dilutes the use of the dogwhistle, and 2. Explain the dogwhistle when we get the chance, without telling people to not use the meme. The explanation helps expose the racists, the meme delivers the antidote.


  • Hugucinogens@lemmy.blahaj.zonetomemes@lemmy.worldSwitching back to Firefox
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    There is no Firefox without people’s desire for privacy. There is no sufficient privacy without people removing the diseased fingerprint of multiple big companies.

    There is no possibility of a big browser surviving, without caving to big companies, in the artificially hostile web created by Google’s monopoly.

    And that last one is fundamentally unfair, beyond any accusation of “Derivative!” anyone can make.


  • I can’t, for the love of god, find the damned post and comment that talked about it, no matter how much I look for it.

    Where I found it.

    It was about the same screenshot though, and posted in Lemmy not too long ago (maximum 2 days before this post)

    But, like, this is how language works. If you normalize a different meaning to a word, that word loses its previous function. That’s what oppressive regimes and cultures do to the most useful linguistic tools of the oppressed.

    Short explanation

    They use the specific word, to identify and objectify those that use it first, and then co-opt the word and change the useful meaning to something that helps the oppression instead.

    Am example is the word “woke”, coming from poor African Americans, meaning to keep an eye out for dangerous racists. That word being, over a long period of time, stolen and bastardized by those same racists, and turned into a tool for othering whoever is not part of their cultural group.

    So, it definitely works, and it should work better the more secretive the original meaning is.









  • I’ve legitimately had these thoughts. Being raised amab and isolated af growing up, finally found people I legitimately trusted and loved, for the first time after I was 24. The emotional shock was large to say the least.

    “Wow, this is what some other people’s every day life is? Truly being able to relax around loving people their whole life? That’s so much bullshit.”

    Less memeable, but hey, that’s what we’ve got 😅