

LLMs aren’t built for that, for that you’d be a statistical or probability model AI.
Pretty much all current gen LLMs have that capability. They’ve gone a long way past being just language models.


LLMs aren’t built for that, for that you’d be a statistical or probability model AI.
Pretty much all current gen LLMs have that capability. They’ve gone a long way past being just language models.
Imagine how many new images he could add to his spank bank for that money!


Yeah, it’s practically a stereotype now that they’re all great singers

That I’m not too sure about, but either way it’s possible, just a few clicks away.

It sounds like what you want is already available? As I said, you can pick and choose categories when you subscribe to a blocklist

You have a point. Are you suggesting that for list creators as a voluntary way of organizing, a hard limitation imposed technically, or something else?
Also, note that when subscribing to a list you can choose to enable/disable categories of users, comms, instances, and domains.


Come to the Philippines, where every home has a karaoke set.


Stop making me feel old, damnit.

Hi! Sorry for the late reply, I actually posted a reply much earlier but it looks like I was shadowbanned from piefed.social for about half a day. No, I have no idea why. Whatever insanity led to that looks like it’s been reversed now.
Here’s the reply I posted earlier:
Hey! I totally get your question. I suppose it really depends on the type of blocklist. For your banana example, I wouldn’t expect anyone to review or challenge that. If someone doesn’t like bananas, that’s entirely their preference, and there’s nothing to discuss.
What I had in mind with the corrections rule was more for lists where entries are based on certain criteria or claims about an account. For example, if someone maintains a blocklist of tankies and an account ends up on it because of a misunderstanding or a statement taken out of context, it would be nice if they could approach the maintainer, explain the situation and hopefully have a civil conversation about it.
Of course, the maintainer isn’t obligated to change their mind. It’s more about being open to considering new information.
Keep in mind that these rules aren’t set in stone. This is something relatively new to the Threadiverse, and I think we’ll figure out the nuances as we go along.

deleted by creator
Is this the same guy who was hoarding potions on his deathbed?


I meant the Lemmy post, ofc. Weirdly it’s visible on my end for some reason.


Seems to be visible to me right now


Doesn’t sound like they were abliterated in the least? I’ve tested them and they’ve happily helped me plan bank robberies, cruise ship heists, perfect murders, etc. Not very imaginative though, they kept insisting my plan to blow up the moon was fiction.


Allies of healing what, though? Gets pretty ambiguous at that point. Could literally be a cancer support circle.
Anti-rape allies?

Hey! I totally get your question. I suppose it really depends on the type of blocklist.
For your banana example, I wouldn’t expect anyone to review or challenge that. If someone doesn’t like bananas, that’s entirely their preference, and there’s nothing to discuss.
What I had in mind with the corrections rule was more for lists where entries are based on certain criteria or claims about an account. For example, if someone maintains a blocklist of tankies and an account ends up on it because of a misunderstanding or a statement taken out of context, it would be nice if they could approach the maintainer, explain the situation and hopefully have a civil conversation about it.
Of course, the maintainer isn’t obligated to change their mind. It’s more about being open to considering new information.
Keep in mind that these rules aren’t set in stone. This is something relatively new to the Threadiverse, and I think we’ll figure out the nuances as we go along.


See my other comment. For this to be an unpopular opinion, over half the people reading this would have to be into the game. I very much doubt that’s the case.


Oh I’m not in any way suggesting the game is small or unpopular. However, this is a general purpose community. The actual percentage of people who actually have an interest in the game is way way below half, which is the threshold you would need to make this an unpopular opinion.
You have to admit, deliberately breaking compatibility with Pylova’s identical blocklist feature isn’t the best look though.