• tiredofsametab@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Private companies competing for things ends up with stuff like this. Unless NASA or someone designs a spec and contractually enforces everyone to implement it, problems like this can crop up in all kinds of places.

      • astrsk@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        2 years ago

        And in new fields of privatization, someone has to win out on the standard. It should have been NASA demanding an interoperable spec but someone will win out here eventually and it will be standard in the future.

      • SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Yeah, like how Apple works with other phone and tablet manufacturers to use a unified charging and data port.

        • astrsk@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          2 years ago

          I can’t tell if this is sarcastic because Apple contributed over 20% of the engineers credited with developing USB-C.

          All told, Apple contributed 18 of 79 named engineers listed on the connector certification project or under 23%. 9to5

          • SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            22
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            It’s sarcasm, because it took EU legislation to force them to actually fucking use it in their phones a decade later.

          • WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            They don’t contribute engineers out of the kindness of their hearts. They do it for entirely selfish reasons — to have a large influence in industry standards, and the competitive advantages that enables.

            Do you also believe Google created Chrome for “freedom”, instead of to gain a competitive advantage in web and ad tech standards?

      • BestBouclettes
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 years ago

        Only when it’s their standard most of the time, which is the reason why we have so many standards for so many things that do basically the same thing