jeffw@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 4 months agoExperts: DOJ has "sufficient evidence" to probe Clarence Thomas — but Garland won't go for itwww.salon.comexternal-linkmessage-square43fedilinkarrow-up1543arrow-down18
arrow-up1535arrow-down1external-linkExperts: DOJ has "sufficient evidence" to probe Clarence Thomas — but Garland won't go for itwww.salon.comjeffw@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 4 months agomessage-square43fedilink
minus-squarejonne@infosec.publinkfedilinkarrow-up145arrow-down11·4 months agoLook at what you get when you try to appease Republicans by appointing a federalist society judge to be AG in exchange for 0 Republican votes.
minus-squarevortic@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up29arrow-down6·4 months agoWait, Garland is Federalist Society? That explains so much!
minus-squareRestrictedAccount@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up17·4 months agoExcept that it’s not true
minus-squarevortic@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·4 months agoThanks. I guess is was being a little credulous when I read that.
Look at what you get when you try to appease Republicans by appointing a federalist society judge to be AG in exchange for 0 Republican votes.
Wait, Garland is Federalist Society? That explains so much!
Except that it’s not true
Thanks. I guess is was being a little credulous when I read that.